Opioid Prescribing in Canada following the Legalization of Cannabis: A Clinical and Economic Time-Series Analysis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: On 17 October 2018 recreational cannabis became legal in Canada, thereby increasing access and reducing the stigma associated with its use for pain management. This study assessed total opioid prescribing volumes and expenditures prior to and following cannabis legalization. METHODS: National monthly claims data for public and private payers were obtained from January 2016 to June 2019. The drugs evaluated consisted of morphine, codeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine, oxycodone, tramadol, and the non-opioids gabapentin and pregabalin. All opioid volumes were converted to a mean morphine equivalent dose (MED)/claim, which is analogous to a prescription from a physician. Gabapentin and pregabalin claims data were analyzed separately from the opioids. Time-series regression modelling was undertaken with dependent variables being mean MED/claim and total monthly spending. The slopes of the time-series curves were then compared pre- versus post-cannabis legalization. RESULTS: Over the 42-month period, the mean MED/claim declined within public plans (p < 0.001). However, the decline in MED/claim was 5.4 times greater in the period following legalization (22.3 mg/claim post vs. 4.1 mg/claim pre). Total monthly opioid spending was also reduced to a greater extent post legalization ($Can267,000 vs. $Can95,000 per month). The findings were similar for private drug plans; however, the absolute drop in opioid use was more pronounced (76.9 vs. 30.8 mg/claim). Over the 42-month period, gabapentin and pregabalin usage also declined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that easier access to cannabis for pain may reduce opioid use for both public and private drug plans.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
60% of studies found potential for RCL to have protective effects for opioid-related negative consequences.
“Furthermore, while some findings were mixed and the number of studies limited, 60% of studies found potential for RCL to have protective effects for opioid-related negative consequences.87,88”
From The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use and Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Cites
Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain
Busse, J. W., Craigie, S., Juurlink, D. N., Buckley, D. N., Wang, L., Couban, R. J., Agoritsas, T., Akl, E. A., Carrasco-Labra, A., Cooper, L., et al. (2017) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.170363 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Haroutounian, S., Ratz, Y., Ginosar, Y., Furmanov, K., Saifi, F., Meidan, R., & Davidson, E. (2016) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000364 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Cannabis as a substitute for prescription drugs &ndash; a cross-sectional study
Corroon, J., Mischley, L., & Sexton, M. (2017) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s134330 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Vigil, J. M., Stith, S. S., Adams, I. M., & Reeve, A. P. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187795 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Farrelly, K. N., Wardell, J. D., Marsden, E., Scarfe, M. L., Najdzionek, P., Turna, J., & MacKillop, J. (2023) · Substance Abuse Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/11782218231172054 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dranitsaris, G., DeAngelis, C., Pearson, B., McDermott, L., & Pohlmann-Eden, B.
- Affiliations
- Augmentium Pharma Consulting (Canada) (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dranitsaris, George
- Venue
- Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Published
- 2021-01-25
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 537-544
- ISSN
- 1175-5652 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-1896
- OpenAlex
- W3124736841
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Health Economics and Health Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Scientus Pharma Inc (100)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- opioid prescribing, cannabis legalization, recreational cannabis, opioid use reduction, morphine milligram equivalents, gabapentin, pregabalin, pain management
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Opioid, Canada, Cannabis, Humans, Oxycodone, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review