Cited by 236Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Management and Opioid UseMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The Effect of Medicinal Cannabis on Pain and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Chronic Pain: A Prospective Open-label Study

Haroutounian, Simon, Ratz, Yael, Ginosar, Yehuda, Furmanov, Karina, Saifi, Fayez, Meidan, Ronit, Davidson, Elyad·2016·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this prospective, open-label study was to determine the long-term effect of medicinal cannabis treatment on pain and functional outcomes in participants with treatment-resistant chronic pain. Patients and Methods: The primary outcome was the change in the pain symptom score on the S-TOPS (Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey—Short Form) questionnaire at the 6-month follow-up in an intent-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included the change in S-TOPS physical, social, and emotional disability scales, the pain severity, and pain interference on the Brief Pain Inventory, sleep problems, and the change in opioid consumption. Results: A total of 274 participants were approved for treatment; complete baseline data were available for 206 (intent-to-treat), and complete follow-up data for 176 participants. At follow-up, the pain symptom score improved from median 83.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.2-87.5) to 75.0 (95% CI, 70.8-79.2) ( P <0.001). The pain severity score (7.50 [95% CI, 6.75-7.75] to 6.25 [95% CI, 5.75-6.75]) and the pain interference score (8.14 [95% CI, 7.28-8.43] to 6.71 [95% CI, 6.14-7.14]) improved (both P <0.001), together with most social and emotional disability scores. Opioid consumption at follow-up decreased by 44% ( P <0.001). Serious adverse effects led to treatment discontinuation in 2 participants. Discussion: The treatment of chronic pain with medicinal cannabis in this open-label, prospective cohort resulted in improved pain and functional outcomes, and a significant reduction in opioid use. Results suggest long-term benefit of cannabis treatment in this group of patients, but the study’s noncontrolled nature should be considered when extrapolating the results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000364

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haroutounian, S., Ratz, Y., Ginosar, Y., Furmanov, K., Saifi, F., Meidan, R., & Davidson, E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Pain Relief Unit
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Haroutounian, Simon
  • Ratz, Yael
  • Saifi, Fayez
  • Meidan, Ronit
  • Davidson, Elyad
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2016-12
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1036-1043
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2281864230
Cited by
234
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 2
FWCI
19.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
medical cannabis, chronic pain, treatment-resistant pain, quality of life, disability, pain intensity, pain interference, opioid consumption, sleep disorders, long-term outcomes, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review