Cited by 26Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentPharmaceutical studies and practices

Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Dose Clinical Study

Open access
Weisler, Richard H., Greenbaum, Michael, Arnold, Valerie, Yu, Ming, Yan, Brian, Jaffee, Margo, Robertson, Brigitte·2017·CNS Drugs

Abstract

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHP465 mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Eligible adults [aged 18–55 years; meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition ADHD criteria; baseline ADHD Rating Scale with Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-AP) total scores ≥28] were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo or forced-dose SHP465 MAS (12.5 or 37.5 mg/day) for 4 weeks. The ADHD-RS-AP total score change from baseline to week 4 (primary endpoint) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score at week 4 (key secondary endpoint) were assessed using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Other efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline to week 4 on the ADHD-RS-AP hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness subscales and the percentage of participants categorized as improved on the dichotomized Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement. Safety and tolerability assessments were treatment-emergent adverse events, vital sign and weight changes, Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale responses, and electrocardiogram results. Of 369 screened participants, 275 were randomized (placebo, n = 91; 12.5 mg/day of SHP465 MAS, n = 92; 37.5 mg/day of SHP465 MAS, n = 92) and 236 completed the study (placebo, n = 80; 12.5 mg/day of SHP465 MAS, n = 80; 37.5 mg/day of SHP465 MAS, n = 76). Least-squares mean (95% confidence interval) treatment differences at week 4 significantly favored SHP465 MAS over placebo for the ADHD-RS-AP total score change from baseline [12.5 mg/day: −8.1 (−11.7, −4.4), effect size = 0.67; 37.5 mg/day: −13.4 (−17.1, −9.7), effect size = 1.11; both p < 0.001] and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score [12.5 mg/day: −0.8 (−1.1, −0.4), effect size = 0.68; 37.5 mg/day: −1.2 (−1.6, −0.9), effect size = 1.11; both p < 0.001]. Treatment differences for the change from baseline at week 4 favored 12.5 and 37.5 mg/day of SHP465 MAS, respectively, over placebo on the ADHD-RS-AP hyperactivity/impulsivity (both nominal p < 0.001; effect size = 0.56 and 0.91) and inattentiveness (both nominal p < 0.001; effect size = 0.70 and 1.19) subscales. At the final on-treatment assessment, the percentage of participants categorized as improved on Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement was higher with both SHP465 MAS doses than with placebo (both nominal p < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events reported (>5%) with SHP465 MAS were decreased appetite, dry mouth, insomnia, headache, anxiety, initial insomnia, irritability, and bruxism. Severe treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, respectively, were reported by 8 and 12 participants (placebo, n = 2 and 0; 12.5 mg/day SHP465 MAS, n = 1 and 7; 37.5 mg/day SHP465 MAS, n = 5 and 5). At the final on-treatment assessment, mean ± standard deviation increases from baseline were observed with 12.5 and 37.5 mg/day of SHP465 MAS for pulse (3.3 ± 10.52 and 7.1 ± 11.48 bpm) and blood pressure (systolic 0.2 ± 7.24 and 1.7 ± 9.99 mmHg; diastolic 1.0 ± 7.46 and 2.8 ± 7.90 mmHg) and decreases were observed for weight (−0.97 ± 1.523 and −1.65 ± 2.333 kg), body mass index (−0.33 ± 0.519 and −0.56 ± 0.777 kg/m 2 ), and Fridericia corrected QT interval (−3.0 ± 10.72 and −1.6 ± 13.70 ms). No participant in any treatment group had a positive response for on-study Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale assessments. SHP465 MAS was superior to placebo in reducing ADHD symptoms, with a safety profile consistent with other long-acting stimulants. ClinicalTrials.gov Registry Number: NCT02604407.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40263-017-0455-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]Chan E Fogler JM Hammerness PG Treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescents: a systematic review JAMA. 2016 315 18 1997 2008 10.1001/jama.2016.5453 27163988 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Briars L Todd T A review of pharmacological management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2016 21 3 192 206 27453697 PMC4956327
  3. [4]Bonvicini C Faraone SV Scassellati C Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of genetic, pharmacogenetic and biochemical studies Mol Psychiatry. 2016 21 7 872 884 10.1038/mp.2016.74 27217152 PMC5414093 · DOI
  4. [8]Thomas M Rostain A Prevatt F ADHD diagnosis and treatment in college students and young adults Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2013 24 3 659 679 24654555
  5. [9]Jain R, Katic A. Current and investigational medication delivery systems for treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2016;18(4). doi:10.4088/PCC.16r01979. 27828696 · DOI
  6. [10]McGough JJ Treatment controversies in adult ADHD Am J Psychiatry. 2016 173 10 960 966 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15091207 27690551 · DOI
  7. [12]Ermer JC Shojaei A Pennick M Bioavailability of triple-bead mixed amphetamine salts compared with a dose-augmentation strategy of mixed amphetamine salts extended release plus mixed amphetamine salts immediate release Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 23 5 1067 1075 10.1185/030079907X182095 17519073 · DOI
  8. [14]Adler LA Frick G Yan B A long-term, open-label, safety study of triple-bead mixed amphetamine salts (SHP465) in adults with ADHD J Atten Disord. 2017 28412886
  9. [15]Frick G Yan B Adler LA Triple-bead mixed amphetamine salts (SHP465) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, forced-dose trial J Atten Disord. 2017 28413925
  10. [16]DuPaul GJ Power TJ Anastopoulos AD ADHD Rating Scale-IV: checklists, norms, and clinical interpretation 1998 New York (NY) Guilford Press
  11. [21]Weisler RH Biederman J Spencer TJ Mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in the treatment of adult ADHD: a randomized, controlled trial CNS Spectr. 2006 11 8 625 639 10.1017/S1092852900013687 16871129 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [23]Adler LA Zimmerman B Starr HL Efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, dose-escalation study J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 29 3 239 247 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181a390ce 19440077 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [24]Spencer TJ Adler LA McGough JJ Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Biol Psychiatry. 2007 61 12 1380 1387 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.032 17137560 · DOI
  14. [27]Cortese S Moreira-Maia CR St Fleur D Association between ADHD and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Psychiatry. 2016 173 1 34 43 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15020266 26315982 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weisler, R. H., Greenbaum, M., Arnold, V., Yu, M., Yan, B., Jaffee, M., & Robertson, B.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • CNS Healthcare (US)
  • Shire (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Weisler, Richard H.
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2017-07-15
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
685-697
ISSN
  • 1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-1934
OpenAlex
W2734886752
Cited by
26
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
Shire Development LLC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
mixed amphetamine salts, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, stimulant medication, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention, efficacy, safety, tolerability, adverse events, cardiovascular safety, suicide risk, weight change, electrocardiogram
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review