Cited by 120

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Incidence of Drug- and Herbal and Dietary Supplement-Induced Liver Injury: Preliminary Findings from Gastroenterologist-Based Surveillance in the Population of the State of Delaware

For the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN), Vega, Maricruz, Verma, Manisha, Beswick, David, Bey, Stephanie, Hossack, Jared, Merriman, Nathan, Shah, Ashish, Navarro, Victor·2017·Drug Safety

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40264-017-0547-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, the annual incidence of DILI in the general population has been estimated as 2.7 per 100,000 adults.

    “In the United States, the annual incidence of DILI in the general population has been recently estimated as 2.7 per 100,000 adults, through surveillance in the state of Delaware.”
  • The estimated annual incidence of DILI in China (23.80 per 100,000) is higher than that reported from western countries.

    “the annual incidence in the general population was estimated to be 23.80 per 100,000 persons-higher than that reported from western countries.”
  • The estimated DILI incidence in mainland China (23.80 per 100,000) was higher than that estimated in Iceland (19.1/100,000), France (13.9/100,000), the United States (2.7/100,000), Spain (3.42/100,000) and Sweden (2.4/100,000).

    “which was still higher than that estimated in Iceland (19.1/100,000) 7 , France (13.9/100,000), 9 the United states (2.7/100,000), 10 Spain (3.42/100,000) 21 and Sweden (2.4/100,000) 22 (Table 4).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Larrey D. Epidemiology and individual susceptibility to adverse drug reactions affecting the liver. Semin Liv Dis. 2002;22(2):145–56. · DOI
  2. Moride Y, Haramburu F, Requejo AA, Bégaud B. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions in general practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;43(2):177–81. · DOI
  3. Sgro C, Clinard F, Ouazir K, Chanay H, Allard C, Guilleminet C, et al. Incidence of drug-induced hepatic injuries: a French population-based study. Hepatology. 2002;36(2):451–5. · DOI · Paper page
  4. De Valle MB, Av Klinteberg V, Alem N, Olsson R, Björnsson E. Drug-induced liver injury in a Swedish University hospital out-patient hepatology clinic. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(8):1187–95. · DOI · Paper page
  5. de Abajo FJ, Montero D, Madurga M, García Rodríguez LA. Acute and clinically relevant drug-induced liver injury: a population based case–control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(1):71–80. · DOI
  6. Goldberg DS, Forde KA, Carbonari DM, Lewis JD, Leidi KB, Reddy KR, et al. Population-representative incidence of drug-induced acute liver failure based on an analysis of integrated healthcare system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(7):1353–61. · DOI
  7. Galan MV, Potts JA, Silverman AL, Gordon SC. The burden of acute nonfulminant drug-induced hepatitis in a United States tertiary referral center. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39(1):64–7.
  8. Vuppalanchi R, Liangpunsakul S, Chalasani N. Etiology of new-onset jaundice: how often is it caused by idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury in the United States? Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(3):558–62. · DOI
  9. Fontana RJ, Watkins PB, Bonkovsky HL, Chalasani N, Davern T, Serrano J, DILIN Study Group, et al. Drug-induced liver injury network (DILIN) prospective study: rationale, design and conduct. Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):55–68. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
For the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN), Vega, M., Verma, M., Beswick, D., Bey, S., Hossack, J., Merriman, N., Shah, A., & Navarro, V.
Venue
Drug Safety
Published
2017-05-29
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
783-787
ISSN
  • 0114-5916
  • 1179-1942
Cited by
120
References
2
Language
en
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (4U01DK083027-10)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review