The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liposomal Amphotericin B (AmBisome®): A Review of the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Clinical Experience and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome(®); LAmB) is a unique lipid formulation of amphotericin B. LAmB is a standard of care for a wide range of medically important opportunistic fungal pathogens. LAmB has a significantly improved toxicity profile compared with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (DAmB). Despite nearly 20 years of clinical use, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this agent, which differ considerably from DAmB, remain relatively poorly understood and underutilized in the clinical setting. The molecular pharmacology, preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics, and clinical experience with LAmB for the most commonly encountered fungal pathogens are reviewed. In vitro, experimental animal models and human clinical trial data are summarized, and novel routes of administration and dosing schedules are discussed. LAmB is a formulation that results in reduced toxicity as compared with DAmB while retaining the antifungal effect of the active agent. Its long terminal half-life and retention in tissues suggest that single or intermittent dosing regimens are feasible, and these should be actively investigated in both preclinical models and in clinical trials. Significant gaps remain in knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in special populations such as neonates and children, pregnant women and obese patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Liposome bilayer-coated amphotericin B (LAmB) has been developed to reduce toxicity while retaining antifungal activity, mitigating the dosage limitation of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (DAmB)9.”
From Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids
Bangham, A. D., Standish, M. M., & Watkins, J. C. (1965) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80093-6 · Cited by 4,664
Szer, J. (1999) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127745.x · Cited by 3,373
Walsh, T. J., Anaissie, E. J., Denning, D. W., Herbrecht, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Marr, K. A., Morrison, V. A., Segal, B. H., Steinbach, W. J., Stevens, D. A., et al. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/525258 · Cited by 2,705
Perfect, J. R., Dismukes, W. E., Dromer, F., Goldman, D. L., Graybill, J. R., Hamill, R. J., Harrison, T. S., Larsen, R. A., Lortholary, O., Nguyen, M.-H., et al. (2010) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/649858 · Cited by 2,660
Liposomal Amphotericin B for Empirical Therapy in Patients with Persistent Fever and Neutropenia
Walsh, T. J., Finberg, R. W., Arndt, C., Hiemenz, J., Schwartz, C., Bodensteiner, D., Pappas, P., Seibel, N., Greenberg, R. N., Dummer, S., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903113401004 · Cited by 1,205
Papahadjopoulos, D., Jacobson, K., Nir, S., & Isac, I. (1973) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0005-2736(73)90314-3 · Cited by 998
Walsh, T. J., Pappas, P., Winston, D. J., Lazarus, H. M., Petersen, F., Raffalli, J., Yanovich, S., Stiff, P., Greenberg, R., Donowitz, G., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200201243460403 · Cited by 979
Walsh, T. J., Teppler, H., Donowitz, G. R., Maertens, J. A., Baden, L. R., Dmoszyńska, A., Cornely, O. A., Bourque, M. R., Lupinacci, R. J., Sable, C. A., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040446 · Cited by 907
Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity
Hamill, R. J. (2013) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4 · Cited by 807
Cornely, O. A., Maertens, J. A., Bresnik, M., Ebrahimi, R., Ullmann, A. J., Bouza, E., Heußel, C. P., Lortholary, O., Rieger, C. T., Boehme, A., et al. (2007) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514341 · Cited by 744
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary. 70th ed. London: BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press;2015.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019
Latgé, J.-P., & Chamilos, G. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00140-18 · Cited by 1,400
Mehta, M., Bui, T. A., Yang, X., Aksoy, Y. A., Goldys, E. M., & Deng, W. (2023) · ACS Materials Au · doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00032 · Cited by 776
Nanopharmaceuticals and Nanomedicines Currently on the Market: Challenges and Opportunities
Farjadian, F., Ghasemi, A., Gohari, O., Roointan, A., Karimi, M., & Hamblin, M. R. (2018) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2018-0120 · Cited by 703
Recent advancements in liposome technology
Filipczak, N., Pan, J., Yalamarty, S. S. K., & Torchilin, V. P. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.022 · Cited by 611
Multifunctional nanoparticle-mediated combining therapy for human diseases
Li, X., Peng, X., Zoulikha, M., Boafo, G. F., Magar, K. T., Ju, Y., & He, W. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01668-1 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, N. R. H., Bicanic, T., Salim, R., & Hope, W.
- Affiliations
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stone, Neil R. H.
- Venue
- Drugs
- Published
- 2016-01-27
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-500
- ISSN
- 0012-6667 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-1950
- PMC
- PMC4856207
- OpenAlex
- W2298912458
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (Medical Mycology and Fungal Immunology) (RG12848-10)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Keywords
- liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B deoxycholate, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antifungal agents, opportunistic fungal infection, drug toxicity, dosing regimen, intermittent dosing, neonates, pregnancy, obesity, molecular pharmacology
- MeSH terms
- Amphotericin B, Animals, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Clinical Trials as Topic, Deoxycholic Acid, Drug Combinations, Half-Life, Humans, Tissue Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
