The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback Techniques to Target Functional Deficits Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Motor Control and Reduction of Second Injury Risk
Open accessAbstract
Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention training has been shown to reduce the risk of injury. Less is known about the effect of prevention on second injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Given recent findings that second injury rates exceed 20 % in only the first year following the return to sport, it is imperative that rehabilitation after ACLR is scrutinized so that second injury preventative strategies can be optimized. A potential limitation of current rehabilitative processes following ACLR could be a deficiency in the transition from conscious awareness achieved during rehabilitation sessions to unexpected and automatic movements required for athletic activities on the field. Learning strategies with an internally directed focus have traditionally been utilized but may be less suitable for acquisition of control of complex motor skills required for sport reintegration. Conversely, an externally focused rehabilitation strategy may enhance skill acquisition more efficiently and increase the potential to transfer to competitive sport. This article presents new insights gained from the motor learning domain that may improve neuromuscular training programmes via increased retention from improved techniques and may ultimately reduce the incidence of second ACL injuries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A common exercise, the double-leg squat, is commonly used in ACL prevention programs.14, 25.”
From Injury Risk Factors Integrated Into Self-Guided Real-Time Biofeedback Improves High-Risk Biomechanics (2019) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608 · Cited by 2,297
Paterno, M. V., Schmitt, L. C., Ford, K. R., Rauh, M. J., Myer, G. D., Huang, B., & Hewett, T. E. (2010) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546510376053 · Cited by 1,361
Self-citationAttentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years
Wulf, G. (2012) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2012.723728 · Cited by 1,209
The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus
Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980143000118 · Cited by 1,163
Plyometric Training in Female Athletes
Hewett, T. E., Stroupe, A. L., Nance, T. A., & Noyes, F. R. (1996) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659602400611 · Cited by 1,022
Self-citationLotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hülsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U., Birbaumer, N., & Grodd, W. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563553 · Cited by 993
Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors
Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x · Cited by 898
Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.8.1.6 · Cited by 870
Instructions for Motor Learning: Differential Effects of Internal Versus External Focus of Attention
Wulf, G., Höß, M., & Prinz, W. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601334 · Cited by 740
Motor Learning and Performance
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (1991) · Cited by 668
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Zachry TL, Wulf G, Mercer JA. Effects of focus of attention on reach height. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2005;27:S162–3.
- Hewett TE, Di Stasi SL, Myer GD. Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):216–24. · DOI
- Ford KR, DiCesare C, Myer GD, et al. Real-time biofeedback for ACL injury prevention. American Society of Biomechanics Annual Meeting; Gainesville; 2012.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
National Strength and Conditioning Association Position Statement on Long-Term Athletic Development
Lloyd, R. S., Cronin, J. B., Faigenbaum, A. D., Haff, G. G., Howard, R., Kraemer, W. J., Micheli, L. J., Myer, G. D., & Oliver, J. L. (2016) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001387 · Cited by 550
Self-citationDingenen, B., & Gokeler, A. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0674-6 · Cited by 325
Self-citationGrooms, D. R., Appelbaum, L. G., & Oñate, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2015.5549 · Cited by 281
Buckthorpe, M. W. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01102-z · Cited by 256
Gokeler, A., Neuhaus, D., Benjaminse, A., Grooms, D. R., & Baumeister, J. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01058-0 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gokeler, A., Benjaminse, A., Hewett, T. E., Paterno, M. V., Ford, K. R., Otten, E., & Myer, G. D.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- High Point University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gokeler, Alli
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2013-09-24
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1065-1074
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- PMC
- PMC4166506
- OpenAlex
- W2048097582
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01 AR05563, R01AR049735, R01AR055563, R01AR056259)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Keywords
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, second ACL injury, injury prevention training, external focus, internal focus, motor learning, motor control, neuromuscular training, rehabilitation, skill transfer, return to sport, motor skill retention
- MeSH terms
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Athletic Injuries, Biomechanical Phenomena, Postural Balance, Exercise Therapy, Feedback, Humans, Knee Injuries, Learning, Motor Skills, Movement, Sports, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
