A Review of Resistance Training-Induced Changes in Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis and Their Contribution to Hypertrophy
Abstract
Muscle protein synthesis (MPS) is stimulated by resistance exercise (RE) and is further stimulated by protein ingestion. The summation of periods of RE-induced increases in MPS can induce hypertrophy chronically. As such, studying the response of MPS with resistance training (RT) is informative, as adaptations in this process can modulate muscle mass gain. Previous studies have shown that the amplitude and duration of increases in MPS after an acute bout of RE are modulated by an individual's training status. Nevertheless, it has been shown that the initial responses of MPS to RE and nutrition are not correlated with subsequent hypertrophy. Thus, early acute responses of MPS in the hours after RE, in an untrained state, do not capture how MPS can affect RE-induced muscle hypertrophy. The purpose of this review is provide an in-depth understanding of the dynamic process of muscle hypertrophy throughout RT by examining all of the available data on MPS after RE and in different phases of an RT programme. Analysis of the time course and the overall response of MPS is critical to determine the potential protein accretion after an RE bout. Exercise-induced increases in MPS are shorter lived and peak earlier in the trained state than in the untrained state, resulting in a smaller overall muscle protein synthetic response in the trained state. Thus, RT induces a dampening of the MPS response, potentially limiting protein accretion, but when this occurs remains unknown.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resistance training stimulates synthesis of myofibrillar proteins and muscle hypertrophy.
“In contrast, training to increase strength and/or power requires short duration (<60 s) maximal contractile activity and heavy resistance loading to stimulate the synthesis of myofibrillar proteins and muscle hypertrophy (Damas et al., 2015).”
From Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? (2017) · cites this paper as Damas et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 225
- Authors
- Damas, F., Phillips, S., Vechin, F. C., & Ugrinowitsch, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Damas, Felipe
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2015-03-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 801-807
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2029863879
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- resistance training, muscle protein synthesis, muscle hypertrophy, protein intake, training status, protein accretion
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Humans, Hypertrophy, Muscle Proteins, Biomarkers, Muscle, Skeletal, Resistance Training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review