Cited by 104Digital literacy in educationLibrary Science and Information LiteracyGender and Technology in Education

College students’ digital readiness for academic engagement (DRAE) scale: scale development and validation

Hong, Ah Jeong, Kim, Hye Jeong·2018·The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40299-018-0387-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, A. J., & Kim, H. J.
Affiliations
Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Hye Jeong
Venue
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Published
2018-05-30
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
303-312
ISSN
  • 0119-5646 (ISSN-L)
  • 2243-7908
OpenAlex
W2807106177
Cited by
104
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
digital readiness, academic engagement, digital skills, scale development, scale validation, university students, higher education, undergraduate students, Korean universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review