Cited by 103Extraction and Separation ProcessesIonic liquids properties and applicationsRadioactive element chemistry and processing

Separation and recovery of critical metal ions using ionic liquids

Open access
Makanyire, Terence, Sanchez-Segado, Sergio, Jha, Animesh·2016·Advances in Manufacturing

Abstract

Separation and purification of critical metal ions such as rare-earth elements (REEs), scandium and niobium from their minerals is difficult and often determines if extraction is economically and environmentally feasible. Solvent extraction is a commonly used metal-ion separation process, usually favored because of its simplicity, speed and wide scope, which is why it is often employed for separating trace metals from their minerals. However, the types of solvents widely used for the recovery of metal ions have adverse environmental impact. Alternatives to solvent extraction have been explored and advances in separation technologies have shown commercial establishment of liquid membranes as an alternative to conventional solvent extraction for the recovery of metals and other valuable materials. Liquid membrane transport incorporates solvent extraction and membrane separation in one continuously operating system. Both methods conventionally use solvents that are harmful to the environment, however, the introduction of ionic liquids (ILs) over the last decade is set to minimize the environmental impact of both solvent extraction and liquid membrane separation processes. ILs are a family of organic molten salts with low or negligible vapour pressure which may be formed below 100 °C. Such liquids are also highly thermally stable and less toxic. Their ionic structure makes them thermodynamically favorable solvents for the extraction of metallic ions. The main aim of this article is to review the current achievements in the separation of REE, scandium, niobium and vanadium from their minerals, using ILs in either solvent extraction or liquid membrane processes. The mechanism of separation using ILs is discussed and the engineering constraints to their application are identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40436-015-0132-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makanyire, T., Sanchez-Segado, S., & Jha, A.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Makanyire, Terence
Venue
Advances in Manufacturing
Published
2016-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
33-46
ISSN
  • 2095-3127 (ISSN-L)
  • 2195-3597
OpenAlex
W2272829078
Cited by
103
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB) (GR/T19889/01, GR/L95977/01)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
ionic liquids, critical metal recovery, rare earth elements, scandium, niobium, vanadium, solvent extraction, liquid membrane separation, metal ion separation, separation mechanism, environmental impact of solvents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review