Cited by 779Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisExtraction and Separation Processes

Life Cycle Assessment of Metals: A Scientific Synthesis

Open access
Nuss, Philip, Eckelman, Matthew J.·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We have assembled extensive information on the cradle-to-gate environmental burdens of 63 metals in their major use forms, and illustrated the interconnectedness of metal production systems. Related cumulative energy use, global warming potential, human health implications and ecosystem damage are estimated by metal life cycle stage (i.e., mining, purification, and refining). For some elements, these are the first life cycle estimates of environmental impacts reported in the literature. We show that, if compared on a per kilogram basis, the platinum group metals and gold display the highest environmental burdens, while many of the major industrial metals (e.g., iron, manganese, titanium) are found at the lower end of the environmental impacts scale. If compared on the basis of their global annual production in 2008, iron and aluminum display the largest impacts, and thallium and tellurium the lowest. With the exception of a few metals, environmental impacts of the majority of elements are dominated by the purification and refining stages in which metals are transformed from a concentrate into their metallic form. Out of the 63 metals investigated, 42 metals are obtained as co-products in multi output processes. We test the sensitivity of varying allocation rationales, in which the environmental burden are allocated to the various metal and mineral products, on the overall results. Monte-Carlo simulation is applied to further investigate the stability of our results. This analysis is the most comprehensive life cycle comparison of metals to date and allows for the first time a complete bottom-up estimate of life cycle impacts of the metals and mining sector globally. We estimate global direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions in 2008 at 3.4 Gt CO2-eq per year and primary energy use at 49 EJ per year (9.5% of global use), and report the shares for all metals to both impact categories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0101298

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High natural abundance of iron results in much lower market prices than tin, and its production rates are high and stable and have a low environmental impact.

    “The high natural abundance of iron results in much lower market prices than tin, and its production rates are high and stable and have a low environmental impact.”

    From Iron( <scp>ii</scp> ) carboxylates and simple carboxamides: an inexpensive and modular catalyst system for the synthesis of PLLA and PLLA-PCL block copolymers (2023) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Discussion reports that iron has relatively low environmental impacts per kilogram and large annual production. It also says iron’s total impact is significant because production is so large. The passages do not establish that iron’s natural abundance causes lower prices than tin or that its production rates are stable. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Downcycling constitutes an energy loss: pig iron production causes emissions of 1.5 kg CO2 equivalent per kg iron, while alloying elements range from similar (1.9 kg CO2/kg metal for ferrochromium) to much higher (11 kg CO2/kg nickel from sulfide ores), so emissions associated with highly alloyed steel can be significantly higher than those of construction steel.

    “Such downcycling constitutes itself an energy loss: pig iron production causes emissions of 1.5 kg CO 2 equivalent per kg iron, while alloying elements range from similar (1.9 kg CO 2 /kg metal for ferrochromium) to much higher (11 kg CO 2 /kg nickel from sulfide ores) [170], so that the emissions associated with highly alloyed steel can be significantly higher than those of construction steel.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [7]Graedel TE, Allwood J, Birat J-P, Buchert M, Hagelüken C, et al. (2011) What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates? J Ind Ecol 15:: 355–366. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00342.x/abstract. Accessed 1 October 2012. · DOI
  2. [9]Gupta CK (2004) Chemical Metallurgy. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/3527602003.fmatter/summary. Accessed 24 July 2013. · DOI
  3. [20]NRC (2008) Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy..Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press. 264 p.
  4. [60]Ashby MF, Miller A, Rutter F, Seymour C, Wegst UGK (2012) CES EduPack for Eco Design — A White Paper. Cambridge, UK: Granta Design Ltd.
  5. [62]Liddell N, Spring S, Welch C, Lucas A (2011) Vanadium Sector Review. Ocean Equities Ltd. Available: http://www.niplats.com.au/media/articles/Investor---Research/20110719-Ocean-Equities-Vanadium-Sector-Review---July-2011-261/Vanadium-Thematic-Ocean-Equities-Research-July-2011.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2012.
  6. [92]USBM (1985) Mineral Facts and Problems: 1985 Edition. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Bureau of Mines.
  7. [97]Sutherland CA, Milner EF, Kerby RC, Teindl H, Melin A, et al. (2000) Lead. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14356007.a15_193.pub2/abstract. Accessed 31 May 2013. · DOI
  8. [106]Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, et al. (2009) ReCiPe 2008, A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; First edition Report I: Characterisation. Available: http://www.lcia-recipe.net. Accessed 27 March 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuss, P., & Eckelman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Nuss, Philip
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-07-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e101298
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046102090
Cited by
777
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 121 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
20.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Yale University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
metals, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, mining, metal purification, metal refining, global warming potential, greenhouse gas emissions, human health effects, ecosystem damage, coproducts, platinum group metals, gold, iron, aluminum, thallium, tellurium, primary energy consumption
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Metals, Minerals, Ecosystem, Global Warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review