Cited by 244Pharmaceutical studies and practicesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Recent Advances in Development and Application of Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models: a Transition from Academic Curiosity to Regulatory Acceptance

Open access
Jamei, Masoud·2016·Current Pharmacology Reports

Abstract

There is a renewed surge of interest in applications of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models by the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies. Developing PBPK models within a systems pharmacology context allows separation of the parameters pertaining to the animal or human body (the system) from that of the drug and the study design which is essential to develop generic drug-independent models used to extrapolate PK/PD properties in various healthy and patient populations. This has expanded the classical paradigm to a 'predict-learn-confirm-apply' concept. Recently, a number of drug labels are informed by simulation results generated using PBPK models. These cases show that either the simulations are used in lieu of conducting clinical studies or have informed the drug label that otherwise would have been silent in some specific situations. It will not be surprising to see applications of these models in implementing precision dosing at the point of care in the near future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40495-016-0059-9

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jamei, M.
Affiliations
Simcyp (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Jamei, Masoud
Venue
Current Pharmacology Reports
Published
2016-04-14
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
161-169
ISSN
2198-641X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341647963
Cited by
244
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 6
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Pharmacology Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Simcyp Limited (A Certara Company)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, regulatory acceptance, systems pharmacology, precision dosing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review