Cited by 5Plant tissue culture and regenerationFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationGrowth and nutrition in plants

Biometric Measurements and Genetic Instability Assessment of In Vitro Micro-Shoots Culture of Populus alba

Hussien, Eman Tawfik, Ahmed, Mohamed Fathy, Ahmed, Eman Zakaria·2022·Plant Physiology Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40502-022-00682-9

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussien, E. T., Ahmed, M. F., & Ahmed, E. Z.
Affiliations
  • Ain Shams University (EG)
  • Helwan University (EG)
Venue
Plant Physiology Reports
Published
2022-08-16
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
398-406
ISSN
  • 2662-253X (ISSN-L)
  • 2662-2548
OpenAlex
W4292002705
Cited by
5
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Physiology Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
Keywords
Populus alba, genomic instability, RAPD polymorphism, sucrose concentration, media power, Murashige and Skoog medium, shoot multiplication, rooting, morphological variation, clonal variation, plantlet growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review