Cited by 65Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Thin-ideal internalization: how much is too much?

Schaefer, Lauren M., Burke, Natasha L., Thompson, J. Kevin·2019·Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity

Abstract

Internalization of the thin-ideal is a risk factor for eating disorders that frequently persists into recovery and increases patient risk for relapse. Addressing thin-ideal internalization as a core element of eating disorder prevention and treatment produces significant reductions in eating pathology. However, research has not yet quantified levels of thin-ideal internalization that may signal increased versus decreased risk for disordered eating. To address this gap in the literature, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify a thin-ideal internalization cutoff score that signified clinically-meaningful eating disorder pathology. 787 college women (age M = 20.17, SD = 2.41; BMI M = 23.58, SD = 5.29) were classified as "healthy" (N = 717) or those with significant disordered eating (N = 70) using established clinical cutoffs for the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. ROC curve analysis was used to test the performance of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4) Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat subscale in predicting disordered eating status, and to identify a cutoff score that maximized sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between healthy and disordered eating samples. Mean SATAQ-4 internalization scores were 3.29 (SD = 0.92) and 4.27 (SD = 0.62) for healthy and disordered eating participants, respectively. The SATAQ-4 internalization scores were good predictors of disordered eating status (area under the curve = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.86). The optimal cutoff of 3.78 (measured on a 1-5 Likert scale) yielded a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64. Overall, results provide preliminary support for the discriminant validity of SATAQ-4 thin internalization scores and suggest that even moderate levels of thin-ideal internalization may be predictive of clinically-significant eating pathology. It may be important for prevention and intervention work to actively seek to reduce internalization levels below this clinical cutoff, though future work is needed to bear this out.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40519-018-0498-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If similar numerical criteria apply to the SATAQ-4 athletic/muscular subscale, a woman would need to have moved almost 70% of the way towards acquiring the SA 25 image as her internal visual representation of ideal/most attractive before exhibiting life altering changes in behavior.

    “If we make the assumption that similar numerical criteria might apply to the SATAQ-4 athletic/muscular subscale reported here, then a woman would need to have moved almost 70% of the way towards acquiring the SA 25 image in our data as her internal visual representation of “ideal”/“most attractive,” before exhibiting life altering changes in behavior.”
  • Schaefer et al. (2019) found that a score of 3.78 (18.9 raw) on the SATAQ-4 thin/low body fat subscale yielded an optimal sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64 for detecting eating disordered women.

    “They found that a score of 3.78 (i.e., 18.9 as a raw score) yielded an optimal sensitivity of 0.81 together with a specificity of 0.64.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 65

Authors
Schaefer, L. M., Burke, N. L., & Thompson, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Neuropsychiatric Research Institute (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Lauren M.
Venue
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2018-03-16
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
933-937
ISSN
  • 1124-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-1262
OpenAlex
W2794383948
Cited by
65
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH082761)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
thin-ideal internalization, disordered eating, eating disorders, cut-off values, female university students, body image, eating disorder prevention, discriminant validity, relapse risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude, Body Image, Female, Humans, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Thinness, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review