Cited by 89Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology and Pedagogy

On the Use of Soft Computing Methods in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Research: a Review of Years 2010–2018

Open access
Charitopoulos, Angelos, Rangoussi, Maria, Koulouriotis, Dimitrios·2020·International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to survey recent research publications that use Soft Computing methods to answer education-related problems based on the analysis of educational data ‘mined’ mainly from interactive/e-learning systems. Such systems are known to generate and store large volumes of data that can be exploited to assess the learner, the system and the quality of the interaction between them. Educational Data Mining (EDM) and Learning Analytics (LA) are two distinct and yet closely related research areas that focus on this data aiming to address open education-related questions or issues. Besides ‘classic’ data analysis methods such as clustering, classification, identification or regression/analysis of variances, soft computing methods are often employed by EDM and LA researchers to achieve their various tasks. Their very nature as iterative optimization algorithms that avoid the exhaustive search of the solutions space and go for possibly suboptimal solutions yet at realistic time and effort, along with their heavy reliance on rich data sets for training, make soft computing methods ideal tools for the EDM or LA type of problems. Decision trees, random forests, artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, support vector machines and genetic/evolutionary algorithms are a few examples of soft computing approaches that, given enough data, can successfully deal with uncertainty, qualitatively stated problems and incomplete, imprecise or even contradictory data sets – features that the field of education shares with all humanities/social sciences fields. The present review focuses, therefore, on recent EDM and LA research that employs at least one soft computing method, and aims to identify (i) the major education problems/issues addressed and, consequently, research goals/objectives set, (ii) the learning contexts/settings within which relevant research and educational interventions take place, (iii) the relation between classic and soft computing methods employed to solve specific problems/issues, and (iv) the means of dissemination (publication journals) of the relevant research results. Selection and analysis of a body of 300 journal publications reveals that top research questions in education today seeking answers through soft computing methods refer directly to the issue of quality – a critical issue given the currently dominant educational/pedagogical models that favor e-learning or computer- or technology-mediated learning contexts. Moreover, results identify the most frequently used methods and tools within EDM/LA research and, comparatively, within their soft computing subsets, along with the major journals relevant research is being published worldwide. Weaknesses and issues that need further attention in order to fully exploit the benefits of research results to improve both the learning experience and the learning outcomes are discussed in the conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40593-020-00200-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of LA methods identified that regression analysis was most commonly combined with Decision Trees, Bayesian analysis, SVM, and Random Forests, and emotion/sentiment analysis used Bayesian/Probabilistic reasoning, SVM, and ANN.

    “A recent review focusing on LA methods (Charitopoulos et al., 2020) identified the most frequently used methods and common connections between certain methods and analysis: (regression analysis was the most commonly combined with Decision Trees, Bayesian analysis, SVM and Random Forests, and emotion/sentiment analysis were found to use Bayesian/Probabilistic reasoning, SVM and ANN).”

    From Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Charitopoulos et al., 2020

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 89

Authors
Charitopoulos, A., Rangoussi, M., & Koulouriotis, D.
Affiliations
  • University of West Attica (GR)
  • Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Corresponding author
  • Charitopoulos, Angelos
  • Rangoussi, Maria
  • Koulouriotis, Dimitrios
Venue
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
371-430
ISSN
1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045430530
Cited by
89
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
soft computing, educational data mining, learning analytics, online learning, student modeling, learning quality, decision tree, random forest, artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, support vector machine, genetic algorithm, evolutionary algorithms, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review