An AI toolkit to support teacher reflection
Abstract
Encouraging teachers to reflect on their instructional practices and course design has been shown to be an effective means of improving instruction and student learning. However, the process of encouraging reflection is difficult; reflection requires quality data, thoughtful analysis, and contextualized interpretation. Because of this, research on and the practice of reflection is often limited to pre-service training or short professional development cycles. This study explores how natural language processing, deep-learning methods can be used to support continuous teacher reflection by facilitating data collection and analysis in any instructional setting that includes ample linguistic and assessment material. Data was collected from an existing introductory undergraduate biology course. A Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory network was trained to predict assessment item difficulty and tasked with assigning difficulty to recorded lectures. Comparison with the instructor’s perceptions of lecture material difficulty suggested the model was highly reliable at predicting difficult lecture material. We discuss how this model could be expanded into an AI toolkit meant to aid in teacher reflection on their practices and curriculum.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One study investigated using an AI toolkit to collect students' assessment data and further support teachers' reflections on curriculum design.
“One study investigated using an AI toolkit to collect students' assessment data and further support teachers' reflections on curriculum design (Phillips et al., 2023).”
From A systematic review of the early impact of artificial intelligence on higher education curriculum, instruction, and assessment (2025) · cites this paper as Phillips et al., 2023
Cites
Effective Reflective Practice: In Search of Meaning in Learning about Teaching
Loughran, J. J. (2002) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487102053001004 · Cited by 1,231 · see citing works
Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans
Baker, R. S. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review
Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Lan, Y. (2024) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Liang, J., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. T. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1522841 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Phillips, T. M., Saleh, A., & Ozogul, G.
- ORCID
- Phillips, Tanner M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 635-658
- ISSN
- 1560-4292
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review