Cited by 124Artificial Intelligence in EducationTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesDigital Education and Society

Through tensions to identity-based motivations: exploring teacher professional identity in artificial intelligence-enhanced teacher training

Open access
Lan, Yanzhen·2024·Teaching and Teacher Education

Abstract

This mixed-methods case study explores teacher professional identity (TPI) tensions and motivations for Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration in teaching within a Chinese university-level AI-enhanced teacher training programme. Surveys were completed by 216 attendees, followed by in-depth qualitative analysis of 15 selected teachers. The study reveals TPI groupness-individuality, humanity-technology, and continuity-openness tensions. Three conceptual models are introduced: Human Intelligence and AI as Navigator, Collaborator, and Inventor. It underscores the critical role of tailored AI-enhanced teacher training in harmonising educators’ diverse identities and motivations with technological advancements, signalling a strategic approach for effective AI integration in global teacher education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As GenAI rapidly reshapes teaching tasks, instructional decision-making, and professional boundaries, teachers' identities undergo adaptation and reconstruction.

    “As GenAI rapidly reshapes teaching tasks, instructional decision-making, and professional boundaries, teachers’ identities undergo adaptation and reconstruction (Lan, 2024).”

    From AI teaching innovation behavior among college teachers: a structural equation modeling analysis based on the AI-TPACK framework, teaching self-efficacy, professional identity, and AI literacy (2026) · cites this paper as Lan, 2024

    Section 3.2.3 (p. 10) describes teachers’ professional identities evolving as they integrate AI, including ChatGPT. The paper supports identity adaptation, but its discussion is chiefly about AI-enhanced teacher training; it does not establish that GenAI is rapidly reshaping instructional decision-making or professional boundaries as the sentence claims. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Buxarrais, M. R. (2021). Teacher ' s ethos and moral and professional identity. In F. Oser, K. Heinrichs, J. Bauer, & T. Lovat (Eds.), The international handbook of teacher ethos: Strengthening teachers, supporting learners (pp. 125 -143). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73644-6\_9. · DOI
  2. Karaolis, A., & Philippou, G. N. (2019). Teachers ' professional identity. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education: Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 397 -417). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13761-8\_18. · DOI
  3. Mohammed, P. S., & Nell ' Watson, E. (2019). Towards inclusive education in the age of artificial intelligence: Perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. In J. Knox, Y. Wang, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and inclusive education: Speculative futures and emerging practices (pp. 17 -37). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4\_2. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Vygotsky, L. S. (2018). In E. Zavershneva, & R. Van Der Veer (Eds.), Vygotsky ' s notebooks . Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-4625-4. (Accessed 10 July 2024). · DOI
  5. Woods, P. (2021). Strategies, commitment and identity; making and breaking the teacher role. In Routledge library editions: Education mini-set N teachers & teacher education research 13 vols (pp. 218 -273). Routledge. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0742-051X(2400268-3/sref69)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lan, Y.
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
151
Pages
104736
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401732938
Cited by
124
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 5
FWCI
46.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
teacher identity, artificial intelligence in teacher education, identity tensions, teacher motivation, Chinese university teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review