ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Paradigm Shift or a Dangerous Tool?
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ChatGPT's ability to explain intricate medical terminology in a comprehensible manner aids in knowledge acquisition, fostering continuous learning and improving medical literacy.
“Its ability to explain intricate medical terminology in a comprehensible manner aids in knowledge acquisition, fostering continuous learning and improving medical literacy [6,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].”
Medical education can benefit significantly from AI-driven tools like ChatGPT.
“Medical education can benefit significantly from AI-driven tools like ChatGPT.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Grabb, D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grabb, Declan
- ORCID
- Grabb, Declan
- Venue
- Academic Psychiatry
- Published
- 2023-05-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439-440
- ISSN
- 1042-9670 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7230
- OpenAlex
- W4376114743
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Academic Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, medical education, artificial intelligence in education, psychiatric training, generative AI tools
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Education, Medical, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
