A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Medicine and Healthcare: Applications, Considerations, Limitations, Motivation and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in various sectors, including medicine and healthcare. Large language models like ChatGPT showcase AI’s potential by generating human-like text through prompts. ChatGPT’s adaptability holds promise for reshaping medical practices, improving patient care, and enhancing interactions among healthcare professionals, patients, and data. In pandemic management, ChatGPT rapidly disseminates vital information. It serves as a virtual assistant in surgical consultations, aids dental practices, simplifies medical education, and aids in disease diagnosis. A total of 82 papers were categorised into eight major areas, which are G1: treatment and medicine, G2: buildings and equipment, G3: parts of the human body and areas of the disease, G4: patients, G5: citizens, G6: cellular imaging, radiology, pulse and medical images, G7: doctors and nurses, and G8: tools, devices and administration. Balancing AI’s role with human judgment remains a challenge. A systematic literature review using the PRISMA approach explored AI’s transformative potential in healthcare, highlighting ChatGPT’s versatile applications, limitations, motivation, and challenges. In conclusion, ChatGPT’s diverse medical applications demonstrate its potential for innovation, serving as a valuable resource for students, academics, and researchers in healthcare. Additionally, this study serves as a guide, assisting students, academics, and researchers in the field of medicine and healthcare alike.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This PRISMA-based systematic review screened literature from November 2022 to August 2023 and included 82 papers on ChatGPT/AI in medicine and healthcare, grouping them into eight application domains. It reports broad potential across pandemic communication, dental and surgical consultation, education, diagnosis, imaging, and pharmaceutical research, while emphasizing ethical, accuracy, privacy, accountability, and human-oversight challenges.
Key findings
- The final corpus comprised 82 papers: G1 treatment/medicine 27 (32.93%), G2 buildings/equipment 2 (2.44%), G3 body parts/disease areas 14 (17.07%), G4 patients 8 (9.76%), G5 citizens 3 (3.66%), G6 cellular imaging/radiology/pulse/medical images 4 (4.88%), G7 doctors/nurses 17 (20.73%), and G8 tools/devices/administration 7 (8.54%).
- Reported ChatGPT applications include pandemic management and rapid dissemination of critical information, virtual assistance in cosmetic orthognathic surgery consultations, dental practice support, medical education, disease diagnosis, radiology/sonar image description, and pharmaceutical research.
- Challenges and ethical considerations include responses based on training data that may be biased or inaccurate, AI-generated content mistaken for human expertise, the need to balance AI with human judgment, privacy and security, accountability, regulation, human oversight, and patient empowerment.
- The stated motivation is to improve patient care, medical research, clinical decision-making, patient engagement, literature analysis, medical documentation, education, remote consultations, and clinical workflows.
Methods
- A PRISMA-based systematic literature review searched Taylor and Francis (31), Google Scholar (179), Scopus (412), Web of Science (239), Elsevier (127), Springer (218), MDPI (41), IEEE Xplore (18), and Wiley (7); the initial query yielded 1273 articles, and the final set was 82 papers.
- Inclusion criteria required English-language articles with specified ChatGPT/medicine/healthcare keywords, published or in press between November 2022 and August 2023, covering objectives, design, applications, benefits, risks, concerns, limitations, conclusions, and recommended actions; all article types were included.
- Data gathering involved full-text review, classification, tabulation, and summarization; no quantitative meta-analytic pooling is described in the provided text.
Limitations
- Stated: included studies tend to focus on theoretical potential rather than practical implementation; ethical and legal concerns persist about AI roles, accuracy, and originality; more comprehensive evaluations of AI-generated content are needed; overreliance may reduce human critical thinking; broader implications are often not thoroughly explored.
- Stated: ChatGPT may provide inaccurate medical information, lacks full comprehension of complex medical contexts, may introduce training-data biases, raises privacy/consent/accountability issues, lacks real-time updates and dynamic learning, and may diminish the role of healthcare professionals through overdependence.
- Evident: despite the title, no meta-analysis methods or results are reported; the search is restricted to English-language studies and a narrow November 2022–August 2023 window, and the focus is specifically on ChatGPT/AI tools, limiting generalizability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 146 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
ChatGPT plays a crucial role in pandemic management by aiding in the swift and accurate dissemination of critical information.
“ChatGPT plays a crucial role in pandemic management by aiding in the swift and accurate dissemination of critical information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A.T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B., and Ricke, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2022). ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports, Eur. Radiol., ahead of print. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Kaarre, 2023, Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as a Supplementary Tool for Providing Orthopaedic Information, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ollivier, 2023, A Deeper Dive into ChatGPT: History, Use and Future Perspectives for Orthopaedic Research, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The integration of ChatGPT into medical practices and healthcare settings presents challenges and ethical considerations.
“The integration of ChatGPT into medical practices and healthcare settings presents challenges and ethical considerations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [18] Busch, 2023, Biomedical Ethical Aspects Towards the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education in Medical Education, Med. Sci. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Friederichs, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing? ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing?, Med. Educ. Online source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Mohammed, 2023, ChatGPT Evaluation: Can It Replace Grammarly and Quillbot Tools?, Br. J. Appl. Linguistics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Corsello, A., and Santangelo, A. (2023). May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT. Children, 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Pratim, 2023, AI Tackles Pandemics: ChatGPT’s Game–Changing Impact on Infectious Disease Control, Ann. Biomed. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Kavian, J.A., Wilkey, H.L., Parth, A., and Boyd, C.J. (2023). Harvesting the Power of Arti Fi Cial Intelligence for Surgery: Uses, Implications, and Ethical Considerations. Am. Surg., 2–4. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Dave, 2023, ChatGPT in Medicine: An Overview of Its Applications, Advantages, Limitations, Future Prospects, and Ethical Considerations, Front. Artif. Intell. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Ruksakulpiwat, 2023, Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions, J. Multidiscip. Healthc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Tustumi, 2023, Future of the Language Models in Healthcare: The Role of Chatgpt, ABCD. Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
One challenge is that ChatGPT's responses are based on the data on which it was trained, which may result in biased or inaccurate information.
“One challenge is that the responses of ChatGPT are based on the data on which it was trained, which may result in biased or inaccurate information.”
- Also stated in: § 1.6. Navigating Limitations and Ethical Considerations · hedged
“The responses are based on the data on which it was trained, potentially resulting in biased or inaccurate information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [18] Busch, 2023, Biomedical Ethical Aspects Towards the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education in Medical Education, Med. Sci. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Friederichs, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing? ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing?, Med. Educ. Online source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Mohammed, 2023, ChatGPT Evaluation: Can It Replace Grammarly and Quillbot Tools?, Br. J. Appl. Linguistics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Corsello, A., and Santangelo, A. (2023). May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT. Children, 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Pratim, 2023, AI Tackles Pandemics: ChatGPT’s Game–Changing Impact on Infectious Disease Control, Ann. Biomed. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Kavian, J.A., Wilkey, H.L., Parth, A., and Boyd, C.J. (2023). Harvesting the Power of Arti Fi Cial Intelligence for Surgery: Uses, Implications, and Ethical Considerations. Am. Surg., 2–4. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Dave, 2023, ChatGPT in Medicine: An Overview of Its Applications, Advantages, Limitations, Future Prospects, and Ethical Considerations, Front. Artif. Intell. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Ruksakulpiwat, 2023, Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions, J. Multidiscip. Healthc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Tustumi, 2023, Future of the Language Models in Healthcare: The Role of Chatgpt, ABCD. Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1.6. Navigating Limitations and Ethical Considerations · hedged
- Premisecitation
ChatGPT can function as a virtual assistant, offering patients crucial preoperative information for cosmetic orthognathic surgery.
“Within the realm of surgical procedures, such as cosmetic orthognathic surgery, ChatGPT can function as a virtual assistant, offering patients crucial preoperative information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A.T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B., and Ricke, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2022). ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports, Eur. Radiol., ahead of print. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Xie, 2023, Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT, Aesthetic Plast. Surg. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Kaarre, 2023, Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as a Supplementary Tool for Providing Orthopaedic Information, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ollivier, 2023, A Deeper Dive into ChatGPT: History, Use and Future Perspectives for Orthopaedic Research, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Medical education can benefit significantly from AI-driven tools like ChatGPT.
“Medical education can benefit significantly from AI-driven tools like ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Hosseini, M., Gao, C.A., Liebovitz, D., Carvalho, A., Ahmad, F.S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., and Holmes, A.K. (2023). An Exploratory Survey about Using ChatGPT in Education, Healthcare, and Research. PLoS ONE, 18. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Mohammed, A.O., Salisu, S.A., Younis, H., Salman, A.M., Sahib, T.M., Akhtom, D., and Hayder, I.M. (2023, November 18). ChatGPT Revisited: Using ChatGPT-4 for Finding References and Editing Language in Medical Scientific Articles. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4621581.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Khairatun, 2023, ChatGPT and Medical Education: A Double-Edged Sword, J. Pedagog. Educ. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Abouammoh, N., Alhasan, K.A., Raina, R., Children, A., and Aljamaan, F. (Cold Spring Harb. Lab., 2023). Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study Among Medical College Faculty and Students in Saudi Arabia Original Research: Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Qualitativ, Cold Spring Harb. Lab., preprint. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Gilson, 2023, How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment, JMIR Med. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Busch, 2023, Biomedical Ethical Aspects Towards the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education in Medical Education, Med. Sci. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Friederichs, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing? ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing?, Med. Educ. Online source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Grabb, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Paradigm Shift or a Dangerous Tool?, Acad. Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ethical concerns arise when content generated by AI is mistaken for the expertise of a human.
“Ethical concerns arise when content generated by AI is mistaken for the expertise of a human.”
- Also stated in: § 3.3. RQ3: What Challenges and Ethical Considerations Are Associated with the Integration of ChatGPT into Medical Practices and Healthcare Settings? · plain
“Ethical concerns arise when content generated by AI is mistaken for the expertise of a human.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [18] Busch, 2023, Biomedical Ethical Aspects Towards the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education in Medical Education, Med. Sci. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Friederichs, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing? ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing?, Med. Educ. Online source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Mohammed, 2023, ChatGPT Evaluation: Can It Replace Grammarly and Quillbot Tools?, Br. J. Appl. Linguistics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Corsello, A., and Santangelo, A. (2023). May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT. Children, 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Pratim, 2023, AI Tackles Pandemics: ChatGPT’s Game–Changing Impact on Infectious Disease Control, Ann. Biomed. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Kavian, J.A., Wilkey, H.L., Parth, A., and Boyd, C.J. (2023). Harvesting the Power of Arti Fi Cial Intelligence for Surgery: Uses, Implications, and Ethical Considerations. Am. Surg., 2–4. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Dave, 2023, ChatGPT in Medicine: An Overview of Its Applications, Advantages, Limitations, Future Prospects, and Ethical Considerations, Front. Artif. Intell. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Ruksakulpiwat, 2023, Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions, J. Multidiscip. Healthc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Tustumi, 2023, Future of the Language Models in Healthcare: The Role of Chatgpt, ABCD. Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 3.3. RQ3: What Challenges and Ethical Considerations Are Associated with the Integration of ChatGPT into Medical Practices and Healthcare Settings? · plain
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 38
- May combine two claims. 29
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe search and filtering process resulted in a total of 1547 papers before exclusions.
“The papers were filtered according to the sequence that was adopted in this research and were divided into two categories: 1273 articles were published in the last eight months (November 2022 to August 2023) and 392 papers appeared in all nine databases or publishers, resulting in a total of 1547 papers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter title/abstract screening and full-text reading, 92 papers were excluded, leaving 82 papers.
“Following a comprehensive scan of the titles and abstracts of the papers, an additional 1273 papers were excluded. After the final full-text reading, 92 papers were excluded. The final set consisted of 82 papers,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe included articles comprised various types: 39 original research articles, 12 review articles, 5 meta-analysis and systematic reviews, 2 case studies, 1 editorial and opinion article, 6 letters to the editor, 1 perspective or commentary article, 4 short communications or brief reports, 1 technical note, 1 research protocol, 3 book reviews, 2 clinical trials and observational studies, and 5短报告.
“We included all types of articles: original research articles, review articles, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, case studies, editorials and opinion articles, letters to the editor, perspective or commentary articles, short communications or brief reports, technical notes, research protocols, book reviews, clinical trials and observational studies, and short reports; the numbers included the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe initial query search yielded 1273 articles.
“The results of the initial query search, which yielded 1273 articles, are as follows: there are 31 articles from Taylor and Francis, 179 articles from Google Scholar, 412 articles from Scopus, 239 articles from Web of Science, 127 articles from Elsevier, 218 articles from Springer, 41 articles from MDPI, 18 articles from IEEE Xplore digital, and 7 articles from Wiley from between November 2022 and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationChatGPT is integrated into dental practices to empower dental assistants and improve the overall patient experience.
“ChatGPT is integrated into dental practices in order to empower dental assistants and improve the overall patient experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Surovkov, J., Strunga, M., Lifkov, M., and Thurzo, A. (2023). The New Role of the Dental Assistant and Nurse in the Age of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Telehealth Orthodontic Care with Dental Monitoring: Preliminary Report. Appl. Sci., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Mijwil, 2023, ChatGPT: Exploring the Role of Cybersecurity in the Protection of Medical Information, Mesopotamian J. Cyber Secur. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe reviewed studies tend to focus on theoretical potential rather than practical implementation, leaving some real-world challenges unaddressed.
“The limitations of these studies include a tendency to focus on theoretical potential rather than practical implementation, which leaves some real-world challenges unaddressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
FindingreasoningCurrent studies frequently lack a thorough exploration of the broader implications of integrating AI, such as ChatGPT, into diverse fields.
“Current studies frequently lack a thorough exploration of the broader implications, which necessitates adopting a more holistic approach to comprehending the complete scope and consequences of integrating AI, such as ChatGPT, into diverse fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSignificant concerns persist regarding the ethical and legal issues surrounding the roles, accuracy, and originality of AI.
“Furthermore, significant concerns persist regarding the ethical and legal issues surrounding the roles, accuracy, and originality of AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationChatGPT can be used in pandemic management, surgical consultations, dental practices, medical education, disease diagnosis, cellular imaging, sonar imaging, radiology, and pharmaceutical research.
“It was used in all areas: healthcare and management [5,6,7,8,9], aiding cosmetic orthognathic surgery consultation [10], revolutionising dental practices [8,11,12], medical scientific articles and education fields [6,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], support in disease diagnosis [24], revolutionising radiology, sonar imaging and writing assessment [13,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], pharmaceutical”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A.T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B., and Ricke, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2022). ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports, Eur. Radiol., ahead of print. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Xie, 2023, Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT, Aesthetic Plast. Surg. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Surovkov, J., Strunga, M., Lifkov, M., and Thurzo, A. (2023). The New Role of the Dental Assistant and Nurse in the Age of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Telehealth Orthodontic Care with Dental Monitoring: Preliminary Report. Appl. Sci., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Mijwil, 2023, ChatGPT: Exploring the Role of Cybersecurity in the Protection of Medical Information, Mesopotamian J. Cyber Secur. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenChatGPT's ability to simplify complex medical concepts has enhanced medical education, leading to improved knowledge acquisition.
“The ability of ChatGPT to simplify complex medical concepts has enhanced medical education, leading to improved knowledge acquisition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
FindingreasoningChatGPT expedited pharmaceutical research by sifting through scientific literature and suggesting research directions.
“It accomplished this by sifting through scientific literature and suggesting research directions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe integration of AI into dental practices has enhanced patient experiences by efficiently addressing inquiries and providing guidance.
“The integration of AI into dental practices has enhanced patient experiences by efficiently addressing inquiries and providing guidance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningPharmaceutical research benefiting from ChatGPT was a realm that expedited research processes.
“Pharmaceutical research, benefiting from ChatGPT, was another realm that expedited research processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningChatGPT provided standardised information and facilitated informed patient decisions in cosmetic orthognathic surgery consultations.
“It provided standardised information and facilitated informed patient decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenChatGPT displayed potential in disease diagnosis by offering differential diagnoses based on patient-reported symptoms and medical history.
“It also displayed potential in disease diagnosis by offering differential diagnoses based on patient-reported symptoms and medical history.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenChatGPT demonstrated its role as a virtual assistant in the context of cosmetic orthognathic surgery consultations.
“Furthermore, ChatGPT demonstrated its role as a virtual assistant in the context of cosmetic orthognathic surgery consultations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe use of ChatGPT in disseminating critical information during pandemics and infectious diseases has showcased its ability to efficiently communicate essential updates and guidelines to the public.
“The use of ChatGPT in disseminating critical information during pandemics and infectious diseases has showcased its ability to efficiently communicate essential updates and guidelines to the public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationA systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology.
“As part of this investigation, a systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology (Supplementary Materials) [40,45,46,47,48,49,50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [40] Ruksakulpiwat, 2023, Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions, J. Multidiscip. Healthc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., and Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med., 6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Page, 2021, The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Younis, H.A., Ruhaiyem, N.I.R., Badr, A.A., Abdul-Hassan, A.K., Alfadli, I.M., Binjumah, W.M., Altuwaijri, E.A., and Nasser, M. (2023). Multimodal Age and Gender Estimation for Adaptive Human-Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review. Processes, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Salisu, S., Ruhaiyem, N.I.R., Eisa, T.A.E., Nasser, M., Saeed, F., and Younis, H.A. (2023). Motion Capture Technologies for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review. Diagnostics, 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Younis, H.A., Ruhaiyem, N.I.R., Ghaban, W., Gazem, N.A., and Nasser, M. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications of Robots and Natural Language Processing in Education. Electronics, 12. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Götz, S. (2018, January 14–19). Supporting Systematic Literature Reviews in Computer Science: The Systematic Literature Review Toolkit. Proceedings of the 21th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT's natural language processing capabilities enable it to generate coherent responses, making it a valuable tool for healthcare organisations.
“Its natural language processing capabilities enable it to generate coherent responses, making it a valuable tool for healthcare organisations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A.T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B., and Ricke, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2022). ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports, Eur. Radiol., ahead of print. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Kaarre, 2023, Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as a Supplementary Tool for Providing Orthopaedic Information, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ollivier, 2023, A Deeper Dive into ChatGPT: History, Use and Future Perspectives for Orthopaedic Research, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT ensures standardised and accurate responses, thereby assisting patients in making informed decisions regarding their dental care.
“ChatGPT ensures standardised and accurate responses, thereby assisting patients in making informed decisions regarding their dental care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Surovkov, J., Strunga, M., Lifkov, M., and Thurzo, A. (2023). The New Role of the Dental Assistant and Nurse in the Age of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Telehealth Orthodontic Care with Dental Monitoring: Preliminary Report. Appl. Sci., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Mijwil, 2023, ChatGPT: Exploring the Role of Cybersecurity in the Protection of Medical Information, Mesopotamian J. Cyber Secur. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT assists in handling patient inquiries, providing oral health tips, and guiding patients through postoperative care instructions.
“It assists in the handling of patient inquiries, the provision of oral health tips, and the guidance of patients through postoperative care instructions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Surovkov, J., Strunga, M., Lifkov, M., and Thurzo, A. (2023). The New Role of the Dental Assistant and Nurse in the Age of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Telehealth Orthodontic Care with Dental Monitoring: Preliminary Report. Appl. Sci., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Mijwil, 2023, ChatGPT: Exploring the Role of Cybersecurity in the Protection of Medical Information, Mesopotamian J. Cyber Secur. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT provides rapid updates, preventive measures, and medical guidelines to the public during health crises.
“Specific advantages include its ability to provide rapid updates, preventive measures, and medical guidelines to the public.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A.T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B., and Ricke, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2022). ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports, Eur. Radiol., ahead of print. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Kaarre, 2023, Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as a Supplementary Tool for Providing Orthopaedic Information, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ollivier, 2023, A Deeper Dive into ChatGPT: History, Use and Future Perspectives for Orthopaedic Research, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT can offer standardised and accurate responses that prepare patients for consultations and help them make informed decisions.
“ChatGPT can offer standardised and accurate responses, which prepare patients for their consultations and help them make informed decisions [5,6,7,8,9,10,42,43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A.T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B., and Ricke, J. (Eur. Radiol., 2022). ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports, Eur. Radiol., ahead of print. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Fatani, 2023, ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Xie, 2023, Aesthetic Surgery Advice and Counseling from Artificial Intelligence: A Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT, Aesthetic Plast. Surg. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Kaarre, 2023, Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as a Supplementary Tool for Providing Orthopaedic Information, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ollivier, 2023, A Deeper Dive into ChatGPT: History, Use and Future Perspectives for Orthopaedic Research, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe integration of ChatGPT into medicine and healthcare holds significant potential to transform various aspects of patient care, education, diagnosis, and research.
“In conclusion, the integration of ChatGPT into medicine and healthcare holds significant potential to transform various aspects of patient care, education, diagnosis, and research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn pharmaceutical research, ChatGPT can contribute by sifting through vast volumes of scientific literature, identifying potential drug candidates, and suggesting innovative research directions.
“In the realm of pharmaceutical research, ChatGPT can contribute by sifting through vast volumes of scientific literature, identifying potential drug candidates, and suggesting innovative research directions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [11] Surovkov, J., Strunga, M., Lifkov, M., and Thurzo, A. (2023). The New Role of the Dental Assistant and Nurse in the Age of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Telehealth Orthodontic Care with Dental Monitoring: Preliminary Report. Appl. Sci., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Huh, 2023, Can We Trust AI Chatbots’ Answers about Disease Diagnosis and Patient Care?, J. Korean Med. Assoc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Strunga, 2023, AI-Assisted CBCT Data Management in Modern Dental Practice: Benefits, Limitations and Innovations, Electronics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Pratim, 2023, AI Tackles Pandemics: ChatGPT’s Game–Changing Impact on Infectious Disease Control, Ann. Biomed. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Temsah, M., Aljamaan, F., Malki, K.H., and Alhasan, K. (2023). ChatGPT and the Future of Digital Health: A Study on Healthcare Workers’ Perceptions and Expectations. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Lukac, 2023, Evaluating ChatGPT as an Adjunct for the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Decision–Making in Primary Breast Cancer Cases, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Kavian, J.A., Wilkey, H.L., Parth, A., and Boyd, C.J. (2023). Harvesting the Power of Arti Fi Cial Intelligence for Surgery: Uses, Implications, and Ethical Considerations. Am. Surg., 2–4. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT can generate potential differential diagnoses by analysing patient-reported symptoms and medical history, thereby aiding healthcare providers in narrowing down diagnostic possibilities.
“ChatGPT can generate potential differential diagnoses by analysing patient-reported symptoms and medical history, thereby aiding healthcare providers in narrowing down diagnostic possibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Huh, 2023, Can We Trust AI Chatbots’ Answers about Disease Diagnosis and Patient Care?, J. Korean Med. Assoc. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT has the ability to analyse and generate descriptions for medical images, which can enhance the workflow of radiologists.
“The potential of ChatGPT lies in its ability to analyse and generate descriptions for medical images, which can enhance the workflow of radiologists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [13] Hosseini, M., Gao, C.A., Liebovitz, D., Carvalho, A., Ahmad, F.S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., and Holmes, A.K. (2023). An Exploratory Survey about Using ChatGPT in Education, Healthcare, and Research. PLoS ONE, 18. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Currie, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical Imaging Higher Education, Radiography source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Dahmen, 2023, Artificial Intelligence Bot ChatGPT in Medical Research: The Potential Game Changer as a Double-Edged Sword, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Mohammed, 2023, ChatGPT Evaluation: Can It Replace Grammarly and Quillbot Tools?, Br. J. Appl. Linguistics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Yang, J., Li, H.B., and Wei, D. (2023). The Impact of ChatGPT and LLMs on Medical Imaging Stakeholders: Perspectives and Use Cases. arXiv. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Zhu, 2023, ChatGPT’s Potential Role in Non-English-Speaking Outpatient Clinic Settings, Digit. Health
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Verhoeven, 2023, ChatGPT: When Artificial Intelligence Replaces the Rheumatologist in Medical Writing, Ann. Rheum. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Corsello, A., and Santangelo, A. (2023). May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT. Children, 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Pozzessere, 2023, Optimizing Communication of Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging, the Radiologist Challenge, Tomography source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Ning, 2023, The Potential of “Segment Anything” (SAM) for Universal Intelligent Ultrasound Image Guidance, Biosci. Trends source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT can provide initial observations that highlight regions of interest and assist radiologists in their analyses.
“It has the ability to provide initial observations, which can highlight regions of interest and assist radiologists in their analyses [13,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [13] Hosseini, M., Gao, C.A., Liebovitz, D., Carvalho, A., Ahmad, F.S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., and Holmes, A.K. (2023). An Exploratory Survey about Using ChatGPT in Education, Healthcare, and Research. PLoS ONE, 18. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Currie, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical Imaging Higher Education, Radiography source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Dahmen, 2023, Artificial Intelligence Bot ChatGPT in Medical Research: The Potential Game Changer as a Double-Edged Sword, Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Mohammed, 2023, ChatGPT Evaluation: Can It Replace Grammarly and Quillbot Tools?, Br. J. Appl. Linguistics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Yang, J., Li, H.B., and Wei, D. (2023). The Impact of ChatGPT and LLMs on Medical Imaging Stakeholders: Perspectives and Use Cases. arXiv. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Zhu, 2023, ChatGPT’s Potential Role in Non-English-Speaking Outpatient Clinic Settings, Digit. Health
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Verhoeven, 2023, ChatGPT: When Artificial Intelligence Replaces the Rheumatologist in Medical Writing, Ann. Rheum. Dis. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Corsello, A., and Santangelo, A. (2023). May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT. Children, 10. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Pozzessere, 2023, Optimizing Communication of Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging, the Radiologist Challenge, Tomography source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Ning, 2023, The Potential of “Segment Anything” (SAM) for Universal Intelligent Ultrasound Image Guidance, Biosci. Trends source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT's ability to explain intricate medical terminology in a comprehensible manner aids in knowledge acquisition, fostering continuous learning and improving medical literacy.
“Its ability to explain intricate medical terminology in a comprehensible manner aids in knowledge acquisition, fostering continuous learning and improving medical literacy [6,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [6] Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Temsah, 2023, Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights from a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Hosseini, M., Gao, C.A., Liebovitz, D., Carvalho, A., Ahmad, F.S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., and Holmes, A.K. (2023). An Exploratory Survey about Using ChatGPT in Education, Healthcare, and Research. PLoS ONE, 18. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Mohammed, A.O., Salisu, S.A., Younis, H., Salman, A.M., Sahib, T.M., Akhtom, D., and Hayder, I.M. (2023, November 18). ChatGPT Revisited: Using ChatGPT-4 for Finding References and Editing Language in Medical Scientific Articles. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4621581.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Khairatun, 2023, ChatGPT and Medical Education: A Double-Edged Sword, J. Pedagog. Educ. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Abouammoh, N., Alhasan, K.A., Raina, R., Children, A., and Aljamaan, F. (Cold Spring Harb. Lab., 2023). Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study Among Medical College Faculty and Students in Saudi Arabia Original Research: Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Qualitativ, Cold Spring Harb. Lab., preprint. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Gilson, 2023, How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment, JMIR Med. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Busch, 2023, Biomedical Ethical Aspects Towards the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education in Medical Education, Med. Sci. Educ. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Friederichs, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing? ChatGPT in Medical School: How Successful Is AI in Progress Testing?, Med. Educ. Online source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Grabb, 2023, ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Paradigm Shift or a Dangerous Tool?, Acad. Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChatGPT holds promise in facilitating medical education, supporting remote consultations, and optimising clinical workflows.
“In addition, it holds promise in facilitating medical education, supporting remote consultations, and optimising clinical workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSallam et al. [44] assessed that ChatGPT is beneficial for learning but lacks emotional interaction and poses plagiarism risks in healthcare education.
“Sallam et al. [44] assessed the advantages and disadvantages of ChatGPT in healthcare education. While it is beneficial for learning, it lacks emotional interaction and poses plagiarism risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Sallam, 2023, ChatGPT Applications in Medical, Dental, Pharmacy, and Public Health Education: A Descriptive Study Highlighting the Advantages and Limitations, Narra J source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSerious medical errors could occur if ChatGPT misinterprets patient queries or generates incorrect diagnoses.
“Serious medical errors could occur if patient queries are misinterpreted or incorrect diagnoses are generated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenChatGPT's reliance on training data may introduce biases that could impact the quality and fairness of the information it provides.
“Furthermore, the reliance of ChatGPT on training data may introduce biases, which could potentially impact the quality and fairness of the provided information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT can assist in drug discovery, research proposal writing, and summarising complex medical research, expediting the research process.
“It can assist in drug discovery, research proposal writing, and summarising complex medical research, expediting the research process [11,24,34,35,36,37,38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [11] Surovkov, J., Strunga, M., Lifkov, M., and Thurzo, A. (2023). The New Role of the Dental Assistant and Nurse in the Age of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Telehealth Orthodontic Care with Dental Monitoring: Preliminary Report. Appl. Sci., 13. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Huh, 2023, Can We Trust AI Chatbots’ Answers about Disease Diagnosis and Patient Care?, J. Korean Med. Assoc. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Strunga, 2023, AI-Assisted CBCT Data Management in Modern Dental Practice: Benefits, Limitations and Innovations, Electronics source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Pratim, 2023, AI Tackles Pandemics: ChatGPT’s Game–Changing Impact on Infectious Disease Control, Ann. Biomed. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Temsah, M., Aljamaan, F., Malki, K.H., and Alhasan, K. (2023). ChatGPT and the Future of Digital Health: A Study on Healthcare Workers’ Perceptions and Expectations. Healthcare, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Lukac, 2023, Evaluating ChatGPT as an Adjunct for the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Decision–Making in Primary Breast Cancer Cases, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Kavian, J.A., Wilkey, H.L., Parth, A., and Boyd, C.J. (2023). Harvesting the Power of Arti Fi Cial Intelligence for Surgery: Uses, Implications, and Ethical Considerations. Am. Surg., 2–4. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThere is a risk of overdependence on AI, which may diminish the role of healthcare professionals and reduce critical thinking and human interaction in medical care.
“Lastly, there is a risk of overdependence on AI, which may diminish the role of healthcare professionals, thereby reducing critical thinking and human interaction in medical care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenChatGPT's natural language processing capabilities provide a user-friendly interface for patients to seek medical information, resulting in increased patient engagement and empowerment.
“ChatGPT’s natural language processing capabilities provide a user-friendly interface for patients to seek medical information, resulting in increased patient engagement and empowerment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJohnson, D et al. [5] found that ChatGPT's answers to medical queries by academic physician specialists were generally accurate but with limitations, suggesting a need for further research and model development.
“Johnson, D et al. [5] utilised the accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT in answering medical queries by academic physician specialists. The results generally show accurate information with limitations, which suggests a need for further research and model development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Younis, 2023, ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable, Mesopotamian J. Big Data
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningChatGPT's ability to analyse large amounts of medical literature assists healthcare professionals in staying up to date on the latest research and treatment options.
“Its ability to analyse large amounts of medical literature assists healthcare professionals in staying up to date on the latest research and treatment options.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningChatGPT has the potential to provide inaccurate medical information because it lacks the ability to fully comprehend complex medical contexts.
“One key concern is the potential for inaccuracies in medical information provided by ChatGPT, as it lacks the ability to fully comprehend complex medical contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe motivation for integrating ChatGPT with medicine and healthcare stems from the potential to improve patient care, medical research, and clinical decision-making processes.
“The motivation for integrating ChatGPT with medicine and healthcare stems from the potential to improve patient care, medical research, and clinical decision-making processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEthical challenges arise regarding patient data privacy and consent, as well as accountability for AI-generated medical content.
“Ethical challenges arise regarding patient data privacy and consent, as well as accountability for AI-generated medical content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenA PRISMA-based systematic literature review was conducted as part of this investigation.
“As part of this investigation, a PRISMA-based systematic literature review was conducted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of real-time updates and dynamic learning in ChatGPT could lead to the sharing of outdated or obsolete medical information.
“The sharing of outdated or obsolete medical information could be a potential consequence of the lack of real-time updates and dynamic learning in ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenChatGPT can assist in the generation of accurate and concise medical documentation, thereby streamlining administrative tasks for healthcare providers.
“ChatGPT can assist in the generation of accurate and concise medical documentation, thereby streamlining administrative tasks for healthcare providers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI has the potential to transform many industries, including medicine and healthcare.
“AI has the potential to transform many industries, including medicine and healthcare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a hybrid panel discussion, approximately 40% of participants had utilised ChatGPT, with a higher number of trainees compared to faculty members having experimented with it.
“According to the study, approximately 40% of the participants had utilised ChatGPT, with a higher number of trainees compared to faculty members having experimented with it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Hosseini, M., Gao, C.A., Liebovitz, D., Carvalho, A., Ahmad, F.S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., and Holmes, A.K. (2023). An Exploratory Survey about Using ChatGPT in Education, Healthcare, and Research. PLoS ONE, 18. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLarge language models, such as ChatGPT, have attracted attention for their ability to generate human-like text, revolutionising the healthcare landscape.
“Large language models, such as ChatGPT, have attracted attention for their ability to generate human-like text, revolutionising the healthcare landscape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChatGPT acts as a catalyst for innovation, advancement, and improved patient care within the medical landscape.
“The role of ChatGPT as a catalyst for innovation, advancement, and improved patient care within the medical landscape is underscored by this exploration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn cellular imaging, radiology, and sonar imaging, the descriptive capabilities of ChatGPT could be helpful for radiologists in the analysis of medical images and cellular imaging.
“In the fields of cellular imaging, radiology, and sonar imaging, the descriptive capabilities of ChatGPT could be helpful for radiologists in the analysis of medical images and cellular imaging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningChatGPT offers immense potential.
“However, ChatGPT offers immense potential; however, it also has limitations that stem from its training data and ethical concerns that are related to its output.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe integration of ChatGPT into medicine and healthcare holds vast transformative potential.
“In conclusion, the integration of ChatGPT into medicine and healthcare holds vast transformative potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenChatGPT has limitations that stem from its training data and ethical concerns related to its output.
“However, ChatGPT offers immense potential; however, it also has limitations that stem from its training data and ethical concerns that are related to its output.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Medical professionals frequently use specialised terminology and jargon that may be difficult for a general-purpose chatbot to understand.
“Medical professionals frequently use specialised terminology and jargon that may be difficult for a general-purpose chatbot to understand.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ensuring that the information provided by the chatbot is accurate and reliable is of utmost importance in healthcare.
“Of utmost importance in healthcare is ensuring that the information provided by the chatbot is accurate and reliable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Healthcare data are highly sensitive and subject to strict privacy regulations (like HIPAA in the United States).
“Healthcare data are highly sensitive and subject to strict privacy regulations (like HIPAA in the United States).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Decisions made by chatbots in healthcare settings can have real-life consequences.
“Decisions made by chatbots in healthcare settings can indeed have real-life consequences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Determining who is accountable for incorrect advice or recommendations provided by a chatbot can be a complex matter.
“Determining who is accountable for incorrect advice or recommendations provided by a chatbot can be a complex matter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a requirement for human oversight and intervention, particularly in critical situations, when chatbots assist in healthcare tasks.
“Although chatbots can assist in various healthcare tasks, there is a requirement for human oversight and intervention, particularly in critical situations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Chatbots that provide medical advice may unintentionally bypass the regulatory frameworks established for traditional healthcare providers.
“Chatbots that provide medical advice may unintentionally bypass the regulatory frameworks established for traditional healthcare providers.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several ethical concerns regarding the use of AI in UGME are described, including algorithmic bias and safeguarding the privacy of students and patients.
“Several ethical concerns regarding the use of AI in UGME are described [183]. There are concerns related to algorithmic bias [159] and safeguarding the privacy of students and patients [185, 186].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [185]
Section 1.6, “Navigating Limitations and Ethical Considerations” (page unavailable), discusses ethical concerns about ChatGPT and reports plagiarism risks in healthcare education. Section 1.2 discusses its use by medical students, but the paper does not specifically frame those concerns as arising in undergraduate medical education. The citing sentence assigns algorithmic bias and privacy to other references, so those examples are not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported paper counts do not yield the stated total
MajorAdding the two counts that the paper says result in 1547 papers gives 1665 instead.
Reported 1547 · recomputed 1665
“1273 articles were published in the last eight months (November 2022 to August 2023) and 392 papers appeared in all nine databases or publishers, resulting in a total of 1547 papers.”
Citation [5] is attributed to an author absent from reference [5]
MinorThe text attributes citation [5] to Johnson, D et al., but reference [5] lists Mueen Sahib T. et al. and has a different subject.
“Johnson, D et al. [5] utilised the accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT in answering medical queries by academic physician specialists.”
“5. Mueen Sahib T. Younis H.A. Mohammed A.O. Ali A.H. Salisu S. Noore A.A. Hayder I.M. Shahid M. ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As part of this investigation, a systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology (Supplementary Materials) [40,45–50].”
MethodSallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…cosmetic orthognathic surgery consultation [10], revolutionising dental practices [8,11,12], medical scientific articles and education fields [6,9,13–23], support in disease diagnosis [24], revolutionising radiology, sonar imaging and writing assessment [13,25–33], pharmaceutical research…”
BackgroundGilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/45312 · Cited by 2,078 · see citing works
Dave, T., Athaluri, S. A., & Singh, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1169595 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E. (2023) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
Eysenbach, G. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/46885 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none
Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., Bielaniewicz, J., Gruza, M., Janz, A., Kanclerz, K., et al. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101861 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
ChatGPT - Reshaping medical education and clinical management
Khan, R. A., Jawaid, M., Khan, A. R., & Sajjad, M. (2023) · Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.12669/pjms.39.2.7653 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing
Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00019-5 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports
Jeblick, K., Schachtner, B., Dexl, J., Mittermeier, A., Stüber, A. T., Topalis, J., Weber, T., Wesp, P., Sabel, B. O., Ricke, J., et al. (2023) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice
Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, S. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/48568 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., Kleesiek, J., & Egger, J. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108013 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2023) · BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations · doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Taxonomy and Systematic ReviewPreprint
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.03.30.23287899 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Literature Review: Digital Twin in Healthcare
Aydın, Ö., & Karaarslan, E. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4308687 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Sallam, M., Salim, N., Barakat, M., & Al-Tammemi, A. (2023) · Narra J · doi:10.52225/narra.v3i1.103 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The shaky foundations of large language models and foundation models for electronic health records
Wornow, M., Xu, Y., Thapa, R., Patel, B., Steinberg, E., Fleming, S., Pfeffer, M. A., Fries, J., & Shah, N. H. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00879-8 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
The future of medical education and research: Is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise?
Arif, T. B., Munaf, U., & Ul-Haque, I. (2023) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2023.2181052 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Is this version good for healthcare and research?
Vaishya, R., Misra, A., & Vaish, A. (2023) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102744 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Samaan, J. S., Yeo, Y. H., Rajeev, N., Hawley, L., Abel, S., Ng, W. H., Srinivasan, N., Park, J., Burch, M., Watson, R., et al. (2023) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-023-06603-5 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research
Hosseini, M., Gao, C. A., Liebovitz, D. M., Carvalho, A. M., Ahmad, F. S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., Holmes, K. L., & Kho, A. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.31.23287979 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research
Hosseini, M., Gao, C. A., Liebovitz, D. M., Carvalho, A. M., Ahmad, F. S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., Holmes, K. L., & Kho, A. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292216 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Homolak, J. (2023) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Large language models (LLM) and ChatGPT: what will the impact on nuclear medicine be?
Alberts, I. L., Mercolli, L., Pyka, T., Prenosil, G., Shi, K., Rominger, A., & Afshar-Oromieh, A. (2023) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-023-06172-w · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Oh, N., Choi, G.-S., & Lee, W. Y. (2023) · Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research · doi:10.4174/astr.2023.104.5.269 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Xie, Y., Seth, I., Hunter-Smith, D. J., Rozen, W. M., Ross, R., & Lee, M. (2023) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03338-7 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Putting ChatGPT’s Medical Advice to the (Turing) Test: Survey Study
Nov, O., Singh, N., & Mann, D. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/46939 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Dahmen, J., Kayaalp, M. E., Ollivier, M., Pareek, A., Hirschmann, M. T., Karlsson, J., & Winkler, P. W. (2023) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07355-6 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Impact of ChatGPT on medical chatbots as a disruptive technology
Chow, J. C. L., Sanders, L., & Li, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1166014 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Temsah, O., Khan, S., Chaiah, Y., Senjab, A., Alhasan, K. A., Jamal, A. A., Aljamaan, F., Malki, K. H., Halwani, R., Al‐Tawfiq, J. A., et al. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.37281 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Temsah, M.-H., Aljamaan, F., Malki, K. H., Alhasan, K., Altamimi, I., Aljarbou, R., Bazuhair, F., Alsubaihin, A., Abdulmajeed, N., Alshahrani, F. S., et al. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11131812 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Early applications of ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research
Sedaghat, S. (2023) · Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7861/clinmed.2023-0078 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions
Ruksakulpiwat, S., Kumar, A., & Ajibade, A. (2023) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s413470 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Wang, H., Wu, W., Dou, Z., He, L., & Yang, L. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105173 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Exploring the Role of Cybersecurity in the Protection of Medical Information
Mijwil, M., Aljanabi, M., & Ali, A. H. (2023) · Mesopotamian Journal of CyberSecurity · doi:10.58496/mjcs/2023/004 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
ChatGPT and Ophthalmology: Exploring Its Potential with Discharge Summaries and Operative Notes
Singh, S., Djalilian, A. R., & Ali, M. J. (2023) · Seminars in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2209166 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
ChatGPT and Bard exhibit spontaneous citation fabrication during psychiatry literature search
McGowan, A., Gui, Y., Dobbs, M., Shuster, S., Cotter, M., Selloni, A., Goodman, M., Srivastava, A., Cecchi, G. A., & Corcoran, C. M. (2023) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115334 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Differentiating ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Medical Texts: Quantitative Study
Liao, W., Liu, Z., Dai, H., Xu, S., Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., Zhu, D., Cai, H., Li, Q., et al. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48904 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Lukac, S., Dayan, D., Fink, V., Leinert, E., Hartkopf, A., Veselinovic, K., Janni, W., Rack, B., Pfister, K., Heitmeir, B., et al. (2023) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07130-5 · Cited by 130 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Misidentification: Incorrectly identifying treatment needs, such as Her2 1+ and 2+ patients.”
BackgroundChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research
Fatani, B. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.37285 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
ChatGPT in Medical Imaging Higher Education
Currie, G., Singh, C., Nelson, T., Nabasenja, C., Al-Hayek, Y., & Spuur, K. (2023) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2023.05.011 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
ChatGPT in medical school: how successful is AI in progress testing?
Friederichs, H., Friederichs, W. J., & März, M. (2023) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2023.2220920 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Differentiate ChatGPT-generated and Human-written Medical Texts
Liao, W., Liu, Z., Dai, H., Xu, S., Wu, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., Zhu, D., Cai, H., Liu, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.11567 · Cited by 119
Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease: Take ChatGPT as an Example
Cheng, K., Li, Z., He, Y., Guo, Q., Lu, Y., Gu, S., & Wu, H. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03203-3 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as a Supplementary Tool for Providing Orthopaedic Information
Kaarre, J., Feldt, R., Keeling, L. E., Dadoo, S., Zsidai, B., Hughes, J. D., Samuelsson, K., & Musahl, V. (2023) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07529-2 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Wen, J., & Wang, W. (2023) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.1207 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The Pros and Cons of Using ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Scoping Review
Mohammad, B., Supti, T., Alzubaidi, M., Shah, H., Alam, T., Shah, Z., & Househ, M. (2023) · Studies in Health Technology and Informatics · doi:10.3233/shti230580 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A deeper dive into ChatGPT: history, use and future perspectives for orthopaedic research
Ollivier, M., Pareek, A., Dahmen, J., Kayaalp, M. E., Winkler, P. W., Hirschmann, M. T., & Karlsson, J. (2023) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07372-5 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Use of ChatGPT: What does it mean for biology and environmental science?
Agathokleous, E., Saitanis, C. J., Fang, C., & Yu, Z. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164154 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Future of the Language Models in Healthcare: The Role of Chatgpt
Tustumi, F., Andreollo, N. A., & Aguilar-Nascimento, J. E. D. (2023) · ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) · doi:10.1590/0102-672020230002e1727 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
What Should ChatGPT Mean for Bioethics?
Cohen, I. G. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2233357 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Lahat, A., Shachar, E., Avidan, B., Glicksberg, B. S., & Klang, E. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13111950 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Busch, F., Adams, L. C., & Bressem, K. K. (2023) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-023-01815-x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Giannos, P. (2023) · BMJ Neurology Open · doi:10.1136/bmjno-2023-000451 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician
DiGiorgio, A. M., & Ehrenfeld, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-023-01926-3 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Utilizing ChatGPT-4 for Providing Medical Information on Blepharoplasties to Patients
Cox, A., Seth, I., Xie, Y., Hunter‐Smith, D. J., & Rozen, W. M. (2023) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1093/asj/sjad096 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Younis, H. A., Ruhaiyem, N. I. R., Ghaban, W., Gazem, N. A., & Nasser, M. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12132864 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationMay Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?—The Case of ChatGPT
Corsello, A., & Santangelo, A. (2023) · Children · doi:10.3390/children10040757 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Rahimzadeh, V., Kostick-Quenet, K., Blumenthal Barby, J., & McGuire, A. L. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2233358 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
ChatGPT and medical education: a double-edged sword
Khairatun Hisan, U., & Miftahul Amri, M. (2023) · Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science · doi:10.56741/jpes.v2i01.302 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
AI-Assisted CBCT Data Management in Modern Dental Practice: Benefits, Limitations and Innovations
Urban, R., Haluzová, S., Strunga, M., Surovková, J., Lifková, M., Tomášik, J., & Thurzo, A. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12071710 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Should Artificial Intelligent Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in Favour, Informed by ChatGPT
Polonsky, M. J., & Rotman, J. D. (2023) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1177/14413582231167882 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Sohail, S. S., Farhat, F., Himeur, Y., Nadeem, M., Madsen, D. Ø., Singh, Y., Atalla, S., & Mansoor, W. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4413921 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Motion Capture Technologies for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review
Salisu, S., Ruhaiyem, N. I. R., Eisa, T. A. E., Nasser, M., Saeed, F., & Younis, H. A. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13152593 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationChatGPT: When Artificial Intelligence Replaces the Rheumatologist in Medical Writing
Verhoeven, F., Wendling, D., & Prati, C. (2023) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard-2023-223936 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The impact of ChatGPT and LLMs on medical imaging stakeholders: Perspectives and use cases
Yang, J., Li, H. B., & Wei, D. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100007 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Abouammoh, N., Alhasan, K., Raina, R., Malki, K. A., Aljamaan, F., Tamimi, I., Muaygil, R., Wahabi, H., Jamal, A., Al-Tawfiq, J. A., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.13.23292624 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Can ChatGPT improve communication in hospitals?
Calonge, D. S., Aguerrebere, P. M., Hultberg, P. T., & Shah, M. A. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.mar.19 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Surovková, J., Haluzová, S., Strunga, M., Urban, R., Lifková, M., & Thurzo, A. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13085212 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The wide range of opportunities for large language models such as ChatGPT in rheumatology
Hügle, T. (2023) · RMD Open · doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003105 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
ChatGPT: when the artificial intelligence meets standardized patients in clinical training
Liu, X., Wu, C., Lai, R., Lin, H., Xu, Y., Lin, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-023-04314-0 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Artificial scholarship: LLMs in health professions education research
Ellaway, R. H., & Tolsgaard, M. (2023) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-023-10257-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kavian, J. A., Wilkey, H. L., Patel, P. A., & Boyd, C. J. (2023) · The American Surgeon™ · doi:10.1177/00031348231175454 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
ChatGPT in travel medicine: A friend or foe?
Choudhary, O. P., & Priyanka (2023) · Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102615 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Future of ChatGPT in Pharmacovigilance
Wang, H., Ding, Y. J., & Luo, Y. (2023) · Drug Safety · doi:10.1007/s40264-023-01315-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Alyasiri, O. M., Salisu, S., Younis, H., Salman, A. M., Sahib, T. M., Akhtom, D., & Hayder, I. M. (2024) · Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101842 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationHarnessing the power of ChatGPT in medical education
Guo, A. A., & Li, J. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2023.2198094 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sedaghat, S. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03287-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
ChatGPT's potential role in non-English-speaking outpatient clinic settings
Zhu, Z., Ying, Y., Zhu, J., & Wu, H. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231184091 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Younis, H. A., Ruhaiyem, N. I. R., Badr, A. A., Abdul-Hassan, A. K., Alfadli, I. M., Binjumah, W. M., Altuwaijri, E. A., & Nasser, M. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11051488 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationDifferentiating ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Medical Texts: Quantitative Study (Preprint)Preprint
Liao, W., Liu, Z., Dai, H., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.48904 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Paradigm Shift or a Dangerous Tool?
Grabb, D. (2023) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40596-023-01791-9 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Potential of “Segment Anything” (SAM) for Universal Intelligent Ultrasound Image Guidance
Ning, G., Liang, H., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., & Liao, H. (2023) · BioScience Trends · doi:10.5582/bst.2023.01119 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
ChatGPT Evaluation: Can It Replace Grammarly and Quillbot Tools?
A. younis, H., Mohammed, O., Muthmainnah, Sahib, T. M., Akhtom, D., Hayder, I. M., Salisu, S., & Shahid, M. (2023) · British Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.32996/bjal.2023.3.2.4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationGötz, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings · doi:10.1145/3270112.3270117 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Can We Trust AI Chatbots’ Answers about Disease Diagnosis and Patient Care?
Huh, S. (2023) · Journal of the Korean Medical Association · doi:10.5124/jkma.2023.66.4.218 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Alyasiri, O. M., Salisu, S., Younis, H. A., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4621581 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationAI Tackles Pandemics: ChatGPT’s Game–Changing Impact on Infectious Disease Control
Ray, P. P., & Majumder, P. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03239-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
ChatGPT in Waste Management: Is it a Profitable
Sahib, T. M., Younis, H. A., Alyasiri, O. M., Ali, A. H., Salisu, S., Noore, A. A., Hayder, I. M., & Shahid, M. (2023) · Mesopotamian Journal of Big Data · doi:10.58496/mjbd/2023/014 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationResponse of ChatGPT for Humanoid Robots Role in Improving Healthcare and Patient Outcomes
Janamla, V., Daram, S. B., Rajesh, P., & Kumari, C. H. N. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03267-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Realization of Green 5G Cellular Network Role in Medical Applications: Use of ChatGPT-AI
Janamala, V., Inkollu, S. R., & Daram, S. B. (2023) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03257-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Optimizing Communication of Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging, the Radiologist Challenge
Pozzessere, C. (2023) · Tomography · doi:10.3390/tomography9020057 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T. Y., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/50336 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Is medicine ready for ChatGPT – why not just ask ChatGPT?
Rodigin, A. (2023) · European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine · doi:10.31373/ejtcm/162647 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Almisreb, 2023, Exploring Medical Breakthroughs: A Systematic Review of ChatGPT Applications in Healthcare, Southeast Eur. J. Soft Comput., 12, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of large language model (ChatGPT) in healthcare: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis
Iqbal, U., Tanweer, A., Rahmanti, A. R., Greenfield, D., Lee, L. T.-J., & Li, Y.-C. J. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-025-01131-z · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Knoth, N., Mirsch, M., Laupichler, M. C., Pinski, M., Buchholtz, N. F., Bata, K., & Schultz, B. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100177 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Sadr, H., Nazari, M., Khodaverdian, Z., Farzan, R., Yousefzadeh-Chabok, S., Ashoobi, M. T., Hemmati, H., Hendi, A., Ashraf, A., Pedram, M. M., et al. (2025) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02680-7 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Rony, M. K. K., Numan, S. M., Akter, K., Tushar, H., Debnath, M., Johra, F. T., Akter, F., Mondal, S., Das, M., Uddin, M. J., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36702 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Rony, M. K. K., Parvin, M. R., Wahiduzzaman, M., Debnath, M., Bala, S. D., & Kayesh, I. (2024) · SAGE Open Nursing · doi:10.1177/23779608241245220 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Large Language Model Prompting Techniques for Advancement in Clinical Medicine
Shah, K., Xu, A. Y., Sharma, Y. K., Daher, M., McDonald, C. L., Diebo, B. G., & Daniels, A. H. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13175101 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
A Survey on the Potential of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Tourism Information Services
Alyasiri, O. M., Selvaraj, K., Younis, H. A., Sahib, T. M., Almasoodi, M. F., & Hayder, I. M. (2024) · Babylonian Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.58496/bjai/2024/001 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of Artificial Intelligence tools in supporting decision-making in hospital management
Alves, M., Seringa, J., Silvestre, T., & Magalhães, T. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11602-y · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence chatbots for the nutrition management of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome
Naja, F., Taktouk, M., Matbouli, D., Khaleel, S., Maher, A., Uzun, B., Alameddine, M., & Nasreddine, L. (2024) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-024-01476-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Hype vs Reality in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Workflows
Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Solaiman, B., Mekki, Y. M., Al‐Thani, D., Farooq, F., Alkubeyyer, M., Abubacker, M. Z., AlSaad, R., Aziz, S., Serag, A., et al. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/70921 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Nia, M. F., Ahmadi, M., & Irankhah, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Dental Medicine · doi:10.3389/fdmed.2024.1456208 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review
Simoni, J., Urtubia-Fernandez, J., Mengual, E., Simoni, D. A., Royo, M., Egaña-Yin, D., Hertog, O. L. A., López-Ortiz, L., Muñoz-Tomás, A., Santiago-Martínez, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08188-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“There are concerns related to algorithmic bias [159] and safeguarding the privacy of students and patients [185, 186].”
Henzler, D., Schmidt, S., Koçar, A., Herdegen, S., Lindinger, G. L., Maris, M. T., Bak, M. A. R., Willems, D. L., Tan, H. L., Lauerer, M., et al. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12664-2 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Embracing the future: Integrating ChatGPT into China’s nursing education system
Ni, Z., Peng, R., Zheng, X., & Xie, P. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.006 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The paradigm of digital health: AI applications and transformative trends
Rashid, Z., Ahmed, H., Nadeem, N., Zafar, S. B., & Yousaf, M. Z. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11081-0 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Roveta, A., Castello, L. M., Massarino, C., Francese, A., Ugo, F., & Maconi, A. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6090227 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Nair, A., Ong, W., Lee, A., Leow, N. W., Makmur, A., Ting, Y. H., Lee, Y. J., Ong, S. J., Tan, J. J. H., Kumar, N., et al. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15091146 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Alyasiri, O. M., Salisu, S., Younis, H., Salman, A. M., Sahib, T. M., Akhtom, D., & Hayder, I. M. (2024) · Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101842 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationJabbar, H., Zgair, I. A., Heydaryan, K., Kadhim, S. A., Mehmandoust, S., Eskandari, V., & Sahbafar, H. (2025) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105445 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Revolutionizing Healthcare Platforms: The Impact of AI on Patient Engagement and Treatment Efficacy
Manishkumar, P. B. D. (2024) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr24201070211 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Saad, H. B., Dergaa, I., Ghouili, H., Ceylan, H., Chamari, K., & Dhahbi, W. (2025) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02299-6 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
University Educators Perspectives on ChatGPT: A Technology Acceptance Model-Based Study
Barakat, M. M., Salim, N. A., & Sallam, M. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.718 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Anser, M. K., Nabi, A. A., Ahmad, I., Abro, M. M. Q., & Zaman, K. (2025) · Health care science · doi:10.1002/hcs2.70018 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Alkalbani, A. M., Alrawahi, A. S., Salah, A., Haghighi, V., Zhang, Y., Alkindi, S. S. A., & Sheng, Q. Z. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16060489 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Artificial General Intelligence: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions in AGI Research
Yenduri, G., Murugan, R., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Bhattacharya, S., Sudheer, D., & Bhushan, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3592708 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Neuro-symbolic AI for auditable cognitive information extraction from medical reports
Prenosil, G., Weitzel, T., Bello, S. C., Mingels, C., Manzini, G., Meier, L. P., Shi, K., Rominger, A., & Afshar‐Oromieh, A. (2025) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-025-01194-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Hoose, S., & Králiková, K. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14090227 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Levin, C., Zaboli, A., Turcato, G., & Saban, M. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105216 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Erkayıran, O., & Aslan, R. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70256 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Tabanlı, A., & Demirkıran, N. D. (2025) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123755 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Sudan, T., Hans, A., & Taggar, R. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2023-0202 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Lastrucci, A., Wandael, Y., Barra, A., Ricci, R., Pirrera, A., Lepri, G., Gulino, R. A., Miele, V., & Giansanti, D. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13237337 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Awogbemi, O., & Desai, D. A. (2025) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107620 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sadegh‐Zadeh, S., Bagheri, M., & Saadat, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1392597 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Dey, H., Arya, N., Mathur, H., Chatterjee, N., & Jadon, R. (2024) · International Journal of Newgen Research in Pharmacy & Healthcare · doi:10.61554/ijnrph.v2i1.2024.67 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Abulibdeh, A. O. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101033 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Shi, C., Wu, L., Lin, X., Chen, X., Zhu, Y., Tan, H., & Zhang, W. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/73419 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Carchiolo, V., & Malgeri, M. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17020076 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Integration of Federated Learning and Blockchain in Healthcare: A TutorialPreprint
Shahsavari, Y., Dambri, O. A., Baseri, Y., Hafid, A. S., & Makrakis, D. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.171340632.25905526/v1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kumar, R., Singh, A. K., Kassar, A. S. A., Humaida, M. I., Joshi, S., & Sharma, M. (2025) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2025.059152 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Enhancing clinical decision‐making: Optimizing ChatGPT's performance in hypertension care
Miao, J., Thongprayoon, C., Fülöp, T., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/jch.14822 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Mondal, S., Das, S., Golder, S. S., Bose, R., Sutradhar, S., & Mondal, H. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) · doi:10.1109/icaiqsa64000.2024.10882330 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Grinberg, N., Whitefield, S., Kleinman, S., Ianculovici, C., Wasserman, G., & Peleg, O. (2025) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-025-06268-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Enhancing risk management in hospitals: leveraging artificial intelligence for improved outcomes
Guerra, R. (2024) · Italian Journal of Medicine · doi:10.4081/itjm.2024.1721 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
AI applications in business: Trends and insights using bibliometric analysis
Dissanayake, H., Manta, O. P., Iddagoda, A., & Palazzo, M. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101075 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Gul, S., Ayturan, K., & Hardalaç, F. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14080804 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
van Breugel, M., Greenhawt, M., Eguíluz‐Gracia, I., Torres, M. J., Anagnostou, A., & Koppelman, G. H. (2025) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2025.08.022 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Platform Architecture for Hospital Systems: Systematic Review
Maimaitiaili, M., Jiamaliding, Y., Dai, G., Xiao, H., Kuerbanjiang, W., & Yi, Y. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/79788 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Bangash, S. H., Khan, I., Husnain, G., Irfan, M. A., & Iqbal, A. (2024) · VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.21015/vtse.v12i1.1760 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Karobari, M. I., Suryawanshi, H., & Patil, S. R. (2024) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000001286 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Milton, C., Vidhya, L., & Thiruvengadam, G. (2024) · Advanced Education · doi:10.20535/2410-8286.315068 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A Review of Applying Large Language Models in Healthcare
Liu, Q., Yang, R., Gao, Q. F., Liang, T., Wang, X., Li, S., Lei, B., & Gao, K. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3524588 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Pandya, S., Bresler, T. E., Wilson, T. W., Htway, Z., & Fujita, M. (2024) · The American Surgeon · doi:10.1177/00031348241269430 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Healthcare professionals and the public sentiment analysis of ChatGPT in clinical practice
Lu, L., Zhu, Y., Yang, J., Yang, Y., Ye, J., Ai, S., & Zhou, Q. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-84512-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nelson, J., Kaplan, J., Simerly, G., Nutter, N., Edson-Heussi, A., Woodham, B., & Broman‐Fulks, J. J. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07320-1 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Quantum leap in medical mentorship: exploring ChatGPT’s transition from textbooks to terabytes
Chokkakula, S., Chong, S., Yang, B., Jiang, H., Yu, J., Han, R., Attitalla, I. H., Yin, C., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1517981 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Patients’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) in cancer care: A scoping review protocol
Hilbers, D., Nekain, N., Bates, A. T., & Nuñez, J.-J. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317276 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cvetkovic, A., Savolainen, I., Koike, M., & Oksanen, A. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100220 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
GPT-4 versus Bard and Bing: LLMs for Fake Image Detection
Al-Janabi, O. M., Alyasiri, O. M., & Jebur, E. A. (2023) · International Conference on Intelligent Cybernetics Technology & Applications (ICICyTA) · doi:10.1109/icicyta60173.2023.10429022 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Medical Imaging: A Review
Sabri, O., Al-Shargabi, B., & Abuarqoub, A. (2025) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.066987 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Occupational Health
Chaudhry, Z. S., & Choudhury, A. (2024) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000003212 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Gambhir, A., Jain, N., Pandey, M., & Simran (2024) · Frontiers of artificial intelligence, ethics and multidisciplinary applications. · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-6790-8_2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
How to read a paper involving artificial intelligence (AI)
Dijkstra, H. P., Greenhalgh, T., Mekki, Y. M., & Morley, J. (2025) · BMJ Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001394 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Qutishat, M., & Shakman, L. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70077 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wang, X., Wang, B., Tew, W. Y., Yang, X., Xu, X., Gao, Y., Chen, Y., & Yam, M. F. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3190 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Measuring the Effectiveness of AI Tools in Clinical Research and Writing: A Case Study in Healthcare
Salisu, S., Alyasiri, O. M., Younis, H. A., Sahib, T. M., Ali, A. H., Noor, A. A., & Hayder, I. M. (2024) · Mesopotamian Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare · doi:10.58496/mjaih/2024/002 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationShahsavari, Y., Baseri, Y., Hafid, A. S., Dambri, O. A., & Makrakis, D. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/80178 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ahmed, W. M. M., Abdalmotalib, M. M., Elbadawi, M. H., Mohammed, G. T. F., Mohamed, W. M. I., Mohammed, F. Z., Salih, H. S., & Mohamed, H. O. Y. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324698 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Motegi, M., Shino, M., Kuwabara, M., Takahashi, H., Matsuyama, T., Tada, H., Hagiwara, H., & Chikamatsu, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06769-1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zota, R. D., Cîmpeanu, I.-A., & Lungu, M. A. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14183727 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Being diagnosed with a rhabdomyosarcoma in the era of artificial intelligence: whom can we trust?
Clerici, C. A., Bernasconi, A., Lasalvia, P., Bisogno, G., Milano, G. M., Trama, A., Chiaravalli, S., Bergamaschi, L., Casanova, M., Massimino, M., et al. (2024) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.31256 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Prazeres, F. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/65108 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Unlocking the Potential of AI in EUS and ERCP: A Narrative Review for Pancreaticobiliary Disease
Araújo, C. C., Frias, J. E. S. D., Mendes, F., Martins, M., Mota, J., Almeida, M. J., Ribeiro, T., Macedo, G., & Mascarenhas, M. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17071132 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ndumgouo, I. M. N., Chowdhury, M. Z. U., Andreescu, S., & Schuckers, S. (2025) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios15110729 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhang, R., Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Deng, Y., & Pow, E. (2025) · Journal of Prosthodontics · doi:10.1111/jopr.70068 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence analysis of minimally invasive surgery data
Raptis, S. P., Theocharopoulos, A., Theocharopoulos, C., Papadakos, S. P., Levantis, G., Kontis, E. A., & Vrahatis, A. G. (2026) · Journal of Robotic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11701-026-03155-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
An Overview of GPT-4's Characteristics through the Lens of 10V's of Big Data
Alyasiri, O. M., Akhtom, D., & Alrasheedy, M. N. (2023) · International Conference on Intelligent Cybernetics Technology & Applications (ICICyTA) · doi:10.1109/icicyta60173.2023.10429032 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationAksoyalp, Z. Ş., & Erdoğan, B. R. (2024) · Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi · doi:10.33483/jfpau.1460173 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kim, J., Koo, B., Nam, M., Jang, K., Lee, J., Chung, M., & Song, Y. B. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15063355 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A practical guide to apply AI in childhood cancer: Data collection and AI model implementation
Wen, S., Theobald, S., Gangas, P., Jiménez, K. C. B., Merks, J. H. M., Schoot, R. A., Meyerheim, M., & Graf, N. M. (2024) · EJC Paediatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100197 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Olia, J. B. H., Raman, A., Hsu, C., Alkhayyat, A., & Nourazarian, A. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109984 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Altom, D. S., Taha, A. I. A., Hussein, A. A. A. M., Elshiekh, M. A. I., Abdelmajed, A. H., Ibrahim, F. I. A., Mohammed, S., & Tifoor, M. M. E. E. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.81001 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Spagl, K. T., Watson, E. W., Jatowt, A., & Weidmann, A. E. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-025-01900-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Beyond Deception: Exploiting Deepfake Technology for Ethical Innovation in Healthcare
Kaur, A., Hoshyar, A. N., Wang, X., & Xia, F. (2024) · International Workshop on Multimedia Computing for Health and Medicine (MCHM) · doi:10.1145/3688868.3689196 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jadwal, P. K., & Saini, H. K. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394271382.ch3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Ethics and the use of generative AI in professional editing
Otmar, R., Michael, R., Mullins, S., & Day, K. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00521-7 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Maslinski, J., Grasfield, R. H., Awasthi, R., Mishra, S. V., Mahapatra, D., & Mathur, P. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.82397 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, J., Min, H., Li, T., Li, J., Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., & Sun, X. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/67303 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Christopher, C., Pathak, N., Babar, Z.-U.-D., & Shrestha, S. (2025) · Aging Medicine · doi:10.1002/agm2.70051 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Temur, K. T., & Mağat, G. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-34773-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Aliyeva, A., Azizli, E., Snyder, V., Muradova, A., Ahmadov, N., Müderris, T., Hashimli, R., Erbek, S. S., Hepkarşı, S., & Dalğıç, A. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15041590 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Luvhengo, T. E., Moeng, M. S., Sishuba, N. T., Makgoka, M., Jonas, L., Mamathuntsha, T. G., Mbambo, T., Kagodora, S. B., & Dlamini, Z. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16203469 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Rehman, F., Omair, M., Zeeshan, N., & Khurram, S. (2024) · Human Nature Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.71016/hnjss/bm22qh45 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Temsah, M.-H. A., Abouammoh, N. A., Alsatrawi, M., Almazyad, M., Aljamaan, F., Vargas-Gutierrez, M., Hay, R., Al-Jelaify, M., Alabdulkreem, W., Assiri, N., et al. (2025) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/00099228251370556 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wiroonrath, S., Na-Nan, K., Inmor, S., & Thammarakkitanon, V. (2024) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-08-2024-2062 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Application of artificial intelligence in medical risk prediction: Bibliometric analysis
Yang, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Li, W., Zhang, X., & Pan, H. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251380652 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mohamed, A. A., Rajendran, S., Colome, D., Sargent, E. C., Schirmer, C. M., Vessell, M., Lucke-Wold, B. P., Sharma, A., Adogwa, O., & Pirris, S. M. (2025) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-025-03793-7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Exploring artificial intelligence chatbots in pediatric fluoride education: a cross-sectional study
Karamüftüoğlu, N., Varol, E. A., & Bal, C. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-28857-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence: Triad-Based Analysis and Attacks Review
Veprytska, O., Kharchenko, V. S., & Illiashenko, O. A. (2025) · Cybernetics and Information Technologies · doi:10.2478/cait-2025-0028 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Taşkıran, A. T., Balık, A. Y., Başaran, E., Baba, D., & Kayıkçı, M. A. (2026) · BMC Urology · doi:10.1186/s12894-026-02048-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Younis, H. A., Eisa, T. A. E., Nasser, M., Sahib, T. M., Noor, A. A., Alyasiri, O. M., Salisu, S., Hayder, I. M., & Younis, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Basrah (IQ)
- King Khalid University (SA)
- Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY)
- Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University (IQ)
- Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
- Federal University Dutse (NG)
- Southern Technical University (IQ)
- Corresponding author
- Younis, Hussain A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diagnostics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-01-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109
- ISSN
- 2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10802884
- OpenAlex
- W4390587679
- Semantic Scholar
- 5062b5b11fa9a528a3ae31da099c51555b8c6a0f
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University (RGP2/52/44)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, ChatGPT, large language models, diagnosis, medical education, radiology, cell imaging, pandemic response, virtual assistants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review