Cited by 17Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDiversity and Career in Medicine

The impact of patient-physician racial and gender concordance on patient satisfaction with outpatient clinic visits

Open access
Shaw, Nathan M., Hills, Nancy, Holler, Jordan, Fernandez, Alicia, Davis, Denise, Palmer, Nynikka R., Sliwka, Diane, Breyer, Benjamin N.·2024·Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Abstract

Background Patient and provider race and gender concordance (patient and physician identify as the same race/ethnicity or gender) may impact patient experience and satisfaction. Objective We sought to examine how patient and physician racial and gender concordance effect patient satisfaction with outpatient clinical encounters. Furthermore, we examined factors that changed satisfaction among concordant and discordant dyads. Design Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) Patient Satisfaction Survey Scores were collected from outpatient clinical encounters between January 2017 and January 2019 at the University of California, San Francisco. Participants Patients who were seen in the eligible time period, who voluntarily provided physician satisfaction scores. Providers with fewer than 30 reviews and encounters with missing data were excluded. Main measures Primary outcome was rate of top satisfaction score. The provider score (1-10 scale) was dichotomized as "top score (9-10)" and "low scores (<9)." Key results A total of 77,543 evaluations met inclusion criteria. Most patients identified as White (73.5%) and female (55.4%) with a median age of 60 (IQR 45, 70). Compared to White patients, Asian patients were less likely to give a top score even when controlling for racial concordance (OR: 0.67; CI 0.63-0.714). Telehealth was associated with increased odds of a top score relative to in-person visits (OR 1.25; CI 1.07-1.48). The odds of a top score decreased by 11% in racially discordant dyads. Conclusions Racial concordance, particularly among older, White, male patients, is a nonmodifiable predictor of patient satisfaction. Physicians of color are at a disadvantage, as they receive lower patient satisfaction scores, even in race concordant pairs, with Asian physicians seeing Asian patients receiving the lowest scores. Patient satisfaction data is likely an inappropriate means of determining physician incentives as such may perpetuate racial and gender disadvantages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40615-023-01676-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in diverse population representation among health care professionals is crucial to promote patient-physician relationships with high satisfaction.

    “Although an increase in diverse population representation among health care professionals is crucial to promote patient-physician relationships with high satisfaction,5”

    From Perceived Success After Participation in the Summer Health Professions Education Program (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Conclusion reports that racial concordance is a strong predictor of patient satisfaction, which supports a link between physician diversity and satisfaction in some patient–physician relationships. But the paper does not establish that increasing workforce diversity is crucial to improving satisfaction; it also reports that physicians of color can receive lower scores even in racially concordant pairs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Olaisen RH, Schluchter MD, Flocke SA, Smyth KA, Korouk- ian SM, Stange KC. Assessing the longitudinal impact of phy- sician-patient relationship on functional health. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(5):422-9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1370/ AFM. 2554. · DOI
  2. Martinez KA, Keenan K, Rastogi R, et al. The association between physician race/ethnicity and patient satisfaction: an exploration in direct to consumer telemedicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(9):2600-6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S11606-020-06005-8. · DOI
  3. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient sat- isfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):609-20. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0277-9536(00) 00164-7. · DOI
  4. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282(6):583-9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMA. 282.6. 583. · DOI
  5. Murphy GP, Awad MA, Tresh A, et al. Association of patient vol- ume with online ratings of California urologists. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):685-6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMAS URG. 2018. 0149. · DOI
  6. Murphy GP, Radadia KD, Breyer BN. Online physician reviews: is there a place for them? Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019;12:85-9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2147/ RMHP. S1703 81. · DOI
  7. Murphy GP, Awad MA, Osterberg EC, et al. Web-based phy- sician ratings for California physicians on probation. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8). https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ JMIR. 7488. · DOI
  8. Petrullo KA, Lamar S, Nwankwo-Otti O, Alexander-Mills K, Viola D. The patient satisfaction survey: what does it mean to your bottom line? J Hosp Adm. 2013;2(2). https:// doi. org/ 10. 5430/ jha. v2n2p1. · DOI
  9. Siegrist RB. Patient satisfaction: history, myths, and mispercep- tions. Virtual Mentor. 2013;15(11):982-7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ VIRTU ALMEN TOR. 2013. 15. 11. MHST1-1311. · DOI
  10. Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient- physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(9):997-1004. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ ARCHI NTE. 159.9. 997. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Haviland MG, Morales LS, Reise SP, Hays RD. Do health care ratings differ by race or ethnicity? Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29(3):134-45. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ s1549-3741(03) 29016-x. · DOI
  12. Murray-García JL, Selby JV, Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Quesenberry CPJ. Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients' values, ratings, and reports regarding physi- cian primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000;38(3):300-10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ 00005 650-20000 3000-00007. · DOI
  13. Kumar D, Schlundt DG, Wallston KA. Patient-physician race concordance and its relationship to perceived health outcomes. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(3):345-51.
  14. LaVeist TA, Nuru-Jeter A, Jones KE. The association of doctor-patient race concordance with health services utilization. J Public Health Pol- icy. 2003;24(3-4):312-23. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 33433 78. · DOI
  15. Laveist TA, Nuru-Jeter A. Is doctor-patient race concordance associated with greater satisfaction with care? J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43(3):296-306.
  16. Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Coburn N, et al. Association of surgeon- patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMAS URG. 2021. 6339. · DOI
  17. Meghani SH, Brooks JM, Gipson-Jones T, Waite R, Whitfield-Har- ris L, Deatrick JA. Patient-provider race-concordance: does it mat- ter in improving minority patients' health outcomes? Ethn Health. 2009;14(1):107-30. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13557 85080 22270 31. · DOI
  18. Rogo-Gupta LJ, Haunschild C, Altamirano J, Maldonado YA, Fassiotto M. Physician gender is associated with Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in outpatient gynecology. Women's Heal issues Off Publ Jacobs Inst Women's Heal. 2018;28(3):281-5. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. whi. 2018. 01. 001. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Woods SE, Heidari Z. The influence of gender on patient satisfac- tion. J gender-specific Med JGSM Off J Partnersh Women's Heal Columbia. 2003;6(4):30-5.
  20. Okunrintemi V, Valero-Elizondo J, Patrick B, et al. Gender differences in patient-reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(24):e010498. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1161/ JAHA. 118. 010498. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Alsaif A, Alqahtani S, Alanazi F, Alrashed F, Almutairi A. Patient satisfaction and experience with anesthesia: a multicenter survey in Saudi population. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(2):304-10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4103/ sja. SJA_ 656_ 17. · DOI
  22. Patel I, Chang J, Srivastava J, Feldman S, Levender M, Balkrishnan R. Patient satisfaction with obstetricians and gynecol- ogists compared with other specialties: analysis of US self- reported survey data. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2011;2:21-6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2147/ PROM. S15747. · DOI
  23. Mueller BR, Lawrence S, Benn E, et al. Disparities in telehealth utilization in patients with pain during COVID-19. Pain Reports. 2022;7(3):E1001. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ PR9. 00000 00000 001001. · DOI
  24. Campos-Castillo C, Anthony D. Racial and ethnic differences in self-reported telehealth use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a secondary analysis of a US survey of internet users from late March. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(1):119. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ JAMIA/ OCAA2 21. · DOI
  25. Brown SH, Griffith ML, Kripalani S, Horst SN. Association of health literacy and area deprivation with initiation and completion of telehealth visits in adult medicine clinics across a large health care system. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223571-1. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ JAMAN ETWOR KOPEN. 2022. 23571. · DOI
  26. Chang ES, Simon M, Dong XQ. Integrating cultural humility into health care professional education and training. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(2):269-78. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10459-010-9264-1. · DOI
  27. Tang C, Tian B, Zhang X, et al. The influence of cultural compe- tence of nurses on patient satisfaction and the mediating effect of patient trust. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(4):749-59. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ JAN. 13854. · DOI
  28. Davidson KW, Shaffer J, Ye S, et al. Interventions to improve hos- pital patient satisfaction with healthcare providers and systems: A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(7):596. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ BMJQS-2015-004758. · DOI
  29. Argueza BR, Saenz SR, McBride D. From diversity and inclusion to antiracism in medical training institutions. Acad Med. 2021;96(6):798- 801. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ ACM. 00000 00000 004017. · DOI
  30. Liao L, Chung S, Altamirano J, et al. The association between Asian patient race/ethnicity and lower satisfaction scores. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):678. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12913-020-05534-6. · DOI
  31. Butler C, Baskin AS, Mmonu NA, et al. Patient satisfaction in a safety net urology clinic. Urol Pract. 2021;8(2):168-75. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ UPJ. 00000 00000 000177. · DOI
  32. Saha S, Hickam DH. Explaining low ratings of patient satisfaction among Asian-Americans. Am J Med Qual Off J Am Coll Med Qual. 2003;18(6):256-64. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10628 60603 01800 606. · DOI
  33. Alfred M, Ubogaya K, Chen X, Wint D, Worral PS. Effectiveness of culturally focused interventions in increasing the satisfaction of hospitalized Asian patients: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2016;14(8):219-56. https:// doi. org/ 10. 11124/ JBISR IR-2016-003048. · DOI
  34. Truong M, Paradies Y, Priest N. Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1-17. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ 1472- 6963-14-99/ TABLES/1. · DOI
  35. Dunsch F, Evans DK, Macis M, Wang Q. Bias in patient sat- isfaction surveys: a threat to measuring healthcare qual- ity. BMJ Glob Heal. 2018;3(2):694. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ BMJGH-2017-000694. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, N. M., Hills, N., Holler, J., Fernandez, A., Davis, D., Palmer, N. R., Sliwka, D., & Breyer, B. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Breyer, Benjamin N.
Venue
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Published
2023-06-21
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
2083-2092
ISSN
  • 2196-8837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-3792
OpenAlex
W4381470577
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
gender concordance, patient satisfaction, outpatient visits, CAHPS, telemedicine, racial disparities in health care, physician incentives
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Sex Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review