Cited by 15Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

Is routine endocrine evaluation necessary after paediatric traumatic brain injury?

Salomón-Estébanez, M. A., Grau, G., Vela, A., Rodríguez, A., Morteruel, E., Castaño, L., Rica, I.·2014·Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

Abstract

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common event in childhood. It is a recognised cause of hypopituitarism both in adult and paediatric patients. Routine endocrine evaluation has been proposed for adult TBI-survivors; nevertheless, incongruous data have been reported in children.Aim The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after TBI in a cohort of children.Material/subjects and methods This is a cross-sectional study comprising retrospective medical record review and prospective testing. Children with brain injury discharged from the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit from year 2004 to 2009 were recruited. Height and weight were recorded, systemic examination was performed and baseline pituitary function tests were undertaken. Provocative tests were performed only if abnormal basal levels were detected.Results Thirty-six patients were collected; the mean age at assessment was 7.2 years and the mean interval since injury 3.3 years. All patients had skull fracture or intracranial haemorrhage; 36.6 % of them had moderate to severe TBI. No abnormalities were found on examination. Low serum IGF 1 levels were detected in four patients and two patients had low serum cortisol levels with inappropriately normal plasma ACTH concentrations. No evidence of pituitary dysfunction was observed in these patients after clinical follow-up, repeated baseline hormone levels or dynamic function tests.Conclusions No endocrine sequelae have been detected in this population. The routine endocrine evaluation in children with mild to moderate TBI might not be justified, according to our findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40618-013-0020-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional studies documented 16%-61% prevalence of hypopituitarism at 1-5 years after injury in children.

    “Cross-sectional studies documented 16%–61% prevalence of hypopituitarism at 1–5 years after injury [23,34,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].”
  • Other studies have reported a lower prevalence of TSH deficiency, ranging from 5 to 12%.

    “In contrast, other studies have reported a lower prevalence of TSH deficiency, ranging from 5 to 12% [20,30].”
  • Salomon-Estebanez et al. observed that in some cases, IGF-1 levels and growth velocity spontaneously normalized within one year following TBI without stimulation testing.

    “Salomon-Estebanez et al. observed that in some cases, IGF-1 levels and growth velocity spontaneously normalized within one year following TBI. Notably, no stimulation testing was necessary, and children showed normal growth throughout the follow-up period, suggesting that milder cases of GHD may resolve without intervention [30].”
  • On retest all four subjects demonstrated spontaneous increase in IGF-I levels and normal growth velocity, therefore no subjects underwent stimulation testing.

    “On retest all four subjects demonstrated spontaneous increase in IGF-I levels and normal growth velocity, therefore no subjects underwent stimulation testing [43].”
  • Salomon-Estebanez suggested that IGF-I values and growth velocity were poor screening tools for detection of TBI-induced GHD.

    “Salomon-Estebanez [43] also suggested that IGF-I values and growth velocity were poor screening tools for detection of TBI-induced GHD.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 15

Authors
Salomón-Estébanez, M. A., Grau, G., Vela, A., Rodríguez, A., Morteruel, E., Castaño, L., & Rica, I.
Affiliations
  • Hospital de Cruces (ES)
  • Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (ES)
Corresponding author
Rica, I.
Venue
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
143-148
ISSN
  • 0391-4097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1720-8386
OpenAlex
W2319435874
Cited by
15
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinological Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
pediatric traumatic brain injury, hypopituitarism, pituitary dysfunction, endocrine evaluation, insulin-like growth factor I, cortisol, ACTH, skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Injuries, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Humans, Hypopituitarism, Infant, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review