The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender identity, gender assignment and reassignment in individuals with disorders of sex development: a major of dilemma
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) are a wide range of congenital conditions characterized by an incongruence of components involved in sexual differentiation, including gender psychosexual development. The management of such disorders is complex, and one of the most crucial decision is represented by gender assignment. In fact, the primary goal in DSD is to have a gender assignment consistent with the underlying gender identity in order to prevent the distress related to a forthcoming Gender Dysphoria. Historically, gender assignment was based essentially on surgical outcomes, assuming the neutrality of gender identity at birth. This policy has been challenged in the past decade refocusing on the importance of prenatal and postnatal hormonal and genetic influences on psychosexual development.Aims (1) to update the main psychological and medical issues that surround DSD, in particular regarding gender identity and gender assignment; (2) to report specific clinical recommendations according to the different diagnosis.Methods A systematic search of published evidence was performed using Medline (from 1972 to March 2016). Review of the relevant literature and recommendations was based on authors' expertise.Results A review of gender identity and assignment in DSD is provided as well as clinical recommendations for the management of individuals with DSD.Conclusions Given the complexity of this management, DSD individuals and their families need to be supported by a specialized multidisciplinary team, which has been universally recognized as the best practice for intersexual conditions. In case of juvenile GD in DSD, the prescription of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues, following the World Professional Association for Transgender Health and the Endocrine Society guidelines, should be considered. It should always be taken into account that every DSD person is unique and has to be treated with individualized care. In this perspective, international registries are crucial to improve the understanding of these challenging conditions and clinical practice, in providing a better prediction of gender identity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A meta-analysis of 35 studies of classic 21OH deficiency showed an average final height of 1.38 standard deviations below the population norm.72”
From Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (2017) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–201 of 201
Embryology of the female genital tract
Cameron, F. J., & Smith, C. R. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527036.002 · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Park R, Consortium on the Management of Disorders of Sex Development (2006) Clinical guidelines for the management of disorders of sex development in childhood. Intersex Society of North America, Whitehouse station, NJ
- McCann-Crosby B, Sutton VR (2015) Disorders of sexual development. Clin Perinatol 42:395–412 (ix–x) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia
El-Maouche, D., Arlt, W., & Merke, D. P. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31431-9 · Cited by 669
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, A. D., Ristori, J., Fanni, E., Castellini, G., Forti, G., & Maggi, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Florence (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Maggi, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
- Published
- 2016-06-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1207-1224
- ISSN
- 0391-4097 (ISSN-L)
- 1720-8386
- OpenAlex
- W2413072702
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 201
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Endocrinological Investigation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Keywords
- disorders of sex development, gender identity, gender assignment, gender reassignment, gender dysphoria, psychosexual development, GnRH analogues, intersex, multidisciplinary care, clinical guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Gender Identity, Humans, Disorders of Sex Development, Gender-Affirming Procedures, Sex Reassignment Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review