Cited by 3Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Master Students’ cGPA Is a Good Predictor of Success in Medical School

Sadik, Amina, Woldemariam, Bersabel, Wang, Xia·2017·Medical Science Educator

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40670-016-0366-0

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Sadik, A., Woldemariam, B., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
Touro University Nevada (US)
Corresponding author
Sadik, Amina
Venue
Medical Science Educator
Published
2017-01-24
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
193-199
ISSN
2156-8650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582664551
Cited by
3
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Medical Science Educator (publishedVersion)
Funders
Touro University Nevada, Master of Health Sciences Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
cumulative grade point average, MCAT scores, osteopathic medical education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review