The Propagation of Race and Racial Differences as Biological in Preclinical Education
Open accessAbstract
Modern scientific research has demonstrated that race is a social construct rather than a biological construct. Yet, medical education research suggests that medical faculty still sometimes characterize race and racial differences as biological during lectures. To explore this dynamic, we reviewed (1) how race is presented in the preclinical curriculum of an undergraduate medical institution and (2) how preclinical faculty both define race and attribute disparate health outcomes to race. In part 1 of the study, the authors conducted a retrospective summative content analysis of all first-year preclinical lectures during the 2018-2019 academic year. In part 2, the authors administered a survey to preclinical faculty on the understanding of race, and responses were assessed through conventional content analysis. A number of faculty suggested a biological basis for racial differences during lectures, though survey results suggested that the majority characterize race as a social construct. Faculty knowledge of race and racial differences as a social construct was not reflected in the majority of the curricular analysis. Instead, the lectures showed that faculty predominantly discussed race without context (e.g., as a standalone epidemiological statistic or an unexplained factor of risk, diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment), or with a biological context. We conclude that there is a discrepancy between preclinical faculty knowledge of race and the presentation of race and racial di…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Race is frequently presented as a biological risk factor for disease in preclinical lectures at U.S. medical schools.
“Race is frequently presented as a biological risk factor for disease in preclinical lectures at U.S. medical schools18–20”
From Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms
Vyas, D. A., Eisenstein, L. G., & Jones, D. S. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmms2004740 · Cited by 1,731 · see citing works
Racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths — United States, 2007–2016
Petersen, E. E., Davis, N. L., Goodman, D., Cox, S., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Shapiro-Mendoza, C., Callaghan, W. M., & Barfield, W. (2019) · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6835a3 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States
Bryc, K., Durand, E. Y., Macpherson, J. M., Reich, D., & Mountain, J. L. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.010 · Cited by 712 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A significant portion of Black people’s ancestors in the USA arrived via the slave trade from Western Africa, so we see higher rates of sickle cell in the Black population based on geographic origins [11].”
BackgroundPolice brutality and black health: Setting the agenda for public health scholars
Alang, S., McAlpine, D., McCreedy, E., & Hardeman, R. (2017) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.303691 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Race Matters? Examining and Rethinking Race Portrayal in Preclinical Medical Education
Tsai, J., Ucik, L., Baldwin, N., Hasslinger, C., & George, P. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001232 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenging Race-Based Medicine Through Historical Education About the Social Construction of Race
Skinner-Dorkenoo, A. L., Rogbeer, K. G., Sarmal, A., Ware, C., & Zhu, J. (2023) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2023.0036 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Race is frequently presented as a biological risk factor for disease in preclinical lectures at U.S. medical schools 18–20 and students are often encouraged to memorize race-disease pairings, 18,21 which are useful diagnostic shortcuts for the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination Step 1.”
Background
- Authors
- Ibrahim, Z., Brown, C., Crow, B., Roumimper, H., & Kureshi, S.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kureshi, Sarah
- Venue
- Medical Science Educator
- Published
- 2022-01-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-219
- ISSN
- 2156-8650 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8814266
- OpenAlex
- W4205765944
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Science Educator (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- social construction of race, racial differences, biological determinism, preclinical curriculum, medical education, health disparities, faculty development, racial disparities in health outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review