Cited by 177Remote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsForest ecology and managementRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Quantifying Forest Biomass Carbon Stocks From Space

Open access
Rodríguez-Veiga, Pedro, Wheeler, James, Louis, Valentin, Tansey, Kevin, Balzter, Heiko·2017·Current Forestry Reports

Abstract

This review presents cutting-edge methods and current and forthcoming satellite remote sensing technologies to map aboveground biomass (AGB). The monitoring of carbon stored in living AGB of forest is of key importance to understand the global carbon cycle and for the functioning of international economic mechanisms aiming to protect and enhance forest carbon stocks. The main challenge of monitoring AGB lies in the difficulty of obtaining field measurements and allometric models in several parts of the world due to geographical remoteness, lack of capacity, data paucity or armed conflicts. Space-borne remote sensing in combination with ground measurements is the most cost-efficient technology to undertake the monitoring of AGB. These approaches face several challenges: lack of ground data for calibration/validation purposes, signal saturation in high AGB, coverage of the sensor, cloud cover persistence or complex signal retrieval due to topography. New space-borne sensors to be launched in the coming years will allow accurate measurements of AGB in high biomass forests (>200 t ha−1) for the first time across large areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40725-017-0052-5

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can be used to predict the LiDAR's outcome from satellite imagery, and the learned estimator can perform predictions at scale.

    “To address this challenge, ML can be used to predict the LiDAR's outcome from satellite imagery [48,599,693].From there, the learned estimator can perform predictions at scale.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [693]

  • Since most of a forest's carbon is stored in above-ground biomass, tree species and heights are a good indicator of the carbon stock.

    “Since most of a forest's carbon is stored in above-ground biomass [693], tree species and heights are a good indicator of the carbon stock.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [693]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. IPCC. Climate Change: Synthesis Report 2014. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core writting team R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC2014 2014. Report No.: 9291691437.
  2. Brewer CK.. Forest carbon monitoring: A review of selected re- mote sensing and carbon measurement tools for REDD+. 2012.
  3. Keith H, Barrett D, Keenan R. Review Allometric Relationships for Estimating Woody Biomass: National Carbon Accounting System, Australian Greenhouse Office 2000.
  4. Henry M. Carbon stocks and dynamics in Sub-Saharian Africa [Doctoral Thesis]: Università degli studi della Tuscia -Viterbo; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez-Veiga, P., Wheeler, J., Louis, V., Tansey, K., & Balzter, H.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Venue
Current Forestry Reports
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
2198-6436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2584181319
Cited by
177
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Forestry Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Leicester
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
aboveground biomass, forest carbon stocks, satellite remote sensing, satellite sensors, biomass mapping, allometric equations, field measurements, calibration and validation, cloud cover, topographic effects, carbon cycle, forest carbon monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review