Direct and derived extinction of avoidance responses in equivalence classes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Symbolically acquired stimulus functions can be reduced through direct learning processes such as respondent and operant extinction, which differ from the procedures that originally generated those functions.
“More specifically, symbolically acquired stimulus functions can be reduced through direct learning processes, namely respondent and operant extinction (Bennett et al., 2020;Boldrin & Debert, 2020;Roche et al., 2008;Vervoort et al., 2014), that differ from the procedures that were used to generate the acquired stimulus functions in the first instance.”
From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Boldrin & Debert, 2020
The second line involves using exposure methods to reduce avoidance response rates established through AARR, targeting either the original directly conditioned discriminative stimulus or derived relational stimuli, and comparing outcomes.
“The second involves attempting to reduce avoidance response rates that have been established through AARR using exposure methods targeting either the original directly conditioned discriminative stimulus for avoidance or the derived relational stimuli whose avoidance functions have been acquired through the AARR process, and comparing outcomes (Boldrin & Debert, 2020;Roche et al., 2008).”
From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Boldrin & Debert, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Boldrin, L. S., & Debert, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Boldrin, Leandro S.
- Venue
- The Psychological Record
- Published
- 2020-07-16
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-444
- ISSN
- 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-3452
- OpenAlex
- W3042420344
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- avoidance response, equivalence classes, stimulus control, stimulus equivalence, avoidance learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review