Cited by 53Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsHuman Motion and Animation

Electromyography-Based Quantitative Representation Method for Upper-Limb Elbow Joint Angle in Sagittal Plane

Open access
Pang, Muye, Guo, Shuxiang, Huang, Qiang, Ishihara, Hidenori, Hirata, Hideyuki·2015·Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative representation method for the upper-limb elbow joint angle using only electromyography (EMG) signals for continuous elbow joint voluntary flexion and extension in the sagittal plane. The dynamics relation between the musculotendon force exerted by the biceps brachii muscle and the elbow joint angle is developed for a modified musculoskeletal model. Based on the dynamics model, a quadratic-like quantitative relationship between EMG signals and the elbow joint angle is built using a Hill-type-based muscular model. Furthermore, a state switching model is designed to stabilize the transition of EMG signals between different muscle contraction motions during the whole movement. To evaluate the efficiency of the method, ten subjects performed continuous experiments during a 4-day period and five of them performed a subsequent consecutive stepping test. The results were calculated in real-time and used as control reference to drive an exoskeleton device bilaterally. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method can provide suitable prediction results with root-mean-square (RMS) errors of below 10° in continuous motion and RMS errors of below 10° in stepping motion with 20° and 30° increments. It is also easier to calibrate and implement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40846-015-0033-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative strategies for high-resolution analysis of an infant's motor development involve quantitative data from digital imaging systems or commercial wearable sensors packages, often also with electroencephalography or electromyography.

    “Alternative strategies for high-resolution analysis of an infant’s motor development involve quantitative data from digital imaging systems or commercial wearable sensors packages (11–15), often also with electroencephalography (16) or electromyography (17).”

    From Miniaturized wireless, skin-integrated sensor networks for quantifying full-body movement behaviors and vital signs in infants (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Abstract describes a quantitative EMG method for estimating elbow movement, supporting the citation as an example of electromyography-based motor analysis. The Experimental Setup reports ten healthy volunteers with a mean age of 24.60 years; the paper does not study infant motor development or establish that EMG is often used for its analysis. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pang, M., Guo, S., Huang, Q., Ishihara, H., & Hirata, H.
Affiliations
  • Kagawa University (JP)
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Shuxiang
Venue
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
Published
2015-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
165-177
ISSN
  • 1609-0985 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-4757
OpenAlex
W2160601648
Cited by
53
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
Keywords
electromyography, biceps brachii, Hill-type muscle model, musculoskeletal model, exoskeleton control, sagittal plane motion, stepping test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review