Why we should (not) worry about generative AI in medical ethics teaching
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lack of empirical research and foundational definitions of AI ethics was noted as a barrier to guiding curriculum development.
“A lack of empirical research and foundational definitions of AI ethics was noted as a barrier to guiding curriculum development [190, 195, 198–200].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [198]
Cites
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
(1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-168_1 · Cited by 4,559 · see citing works
Siegler, M. A., Pellegrino, E. D., & SINGER, P. A. (1990) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce199001102 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The Medical Ethics Curriculum in Medical Schools: Present and Future
Giubilini, A., Milnes, S., & Savulescu, J. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce2016272129 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Evaluating ethics competence in medical education.
Savulescu, J., Crisp, R., Fulford, K. W. M., & Hope, T. (1999) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.25.5.367 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Medical Professionalism and Ethics
Desai, M. K., & Kapadia, J. (2022) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.1177/0976500x221111448 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Davis, M. (1999) · Business and Professional Ethics Journal · doi:10.5840/bpej19991811 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A Model for the Assessment of Medical Students’ Competency in Medical Ethics
Favia, A., Frank, L. E., Gligorov, N., et al. (2013) · AJOB Primary Research · doi:10.1080/21507716.2013.768308 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Schöne-Seifert, B. (2006) · International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine/The international library of ethics, law, and the new medicine · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4241-8_8 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ethics First Aid: Reframing the Role of “Principlism” in Clinical Ethics Education and Practice
Pullman, D. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce200516308 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Musschenga, B. (2013) · Library of ethics and applied philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01369-5_11 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping the ethics of generative AI: a comprehensive scoping review
Hagendorff, T. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09694-w · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review
Simoni, J., Urtubia-Fernandez, J., Mengual, E., Simoni, D. A., Royo, M., Egaña-Yin, D., Hertog, O. L. A., López-Ortiz, L., Muñoz-Tomás, A., Santiago-Martínez, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08188-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“A lack of empirical research and foundational definitions of AI ethics was noted as a barrier to guiding curriculum development [190, 195, 198–200].”
- Authors
- Segers, S.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Segers, Seppe
- ORCID
- Segers, Seppe
- Venue
- International Journal of Ethics Education
- Published
- 2023-10-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-63
- ISSN
- 2363-9997 (ISSN-L)
- 2364-0006
- OpenAlex
- W4387572510
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 0.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- biblio.ugent.be
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Ethics Education (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Keywords
- generative AI, large language models, medical ethics education, medical professionalism, moral reasoning, medical student assessment, student papers, ethical principles, group discussion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
