Populism as Democratization’s Nemesis: The Politics of Regime Hybridization
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
El populismo se convirtió en uno de los desafíos más claros para la democracia en tanto es un fenómeno político masivo, que alcanzó poder y notable influencia política en distintas regiones, cuyos principios están en conflicto y contradicción con la democracia liberal.
“El populismo se convirtió en uno de los desafíos más claros para la democracia en tanto es un fenómeno político masivo, que alcanzo poder y notable influencia política en distintas regiones, cuyos principios están en conflicto y contradicción con la democracia liberal (Peruzzotti, 2017).”
From ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva (2020) · cites this paper as Peruzzotti, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Waisbord, S. (2020) · REVISTA SAAP · doi:10.46468/rsaap.14.2.a1 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Yabanci, B. (2023) · British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies · doi:10.1080/13530194.2021.1972794 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peruzzotti, E.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Peruzzotti, Enrique
- ORCID
- Peruzzotti, Enrique
- Venue
- Chinese Political Science Review
- Published
- 2017-06-29
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-327
- ISSN
- 2365-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 2365-4252
- OpenAlex
- W2734244349
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
- Locations
- Chinese Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- populism, liberal democracy, democratic backsliding, illiberal democracy, regime change, democratic consolidation, populist governments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
