The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1,010 of the 1,010 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
Open accessAbstract
The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will be a transformative experiment for gravitational wave astronomy, and, as such, it will offer unique opportunities to address many key astrophysical questions in a completely novel way. The synergy with ground-based and space-born instruments in the electromagnetic domain, by enabling multi-messenger observations, will add further to the discovery potential of LISA. The next decade is crucial to prepare the astrophysical community for LISA’s first observations. This review outlines the extensive landscape of astrophysical theory, numerical simulations, and astronomical observations that are instrumental for modeling and interpreting the upcoming LISA datastream. To this aim, the current knowledge in three main source classes for LISA is reviewed; ultra-compact stellar-mass binaries, massive black hole binaries, and extreme or interme-diate mass ratio inspirals. The relevant astrophysical processes and the established modeling techniques are summarized. Likewise, open issues and gaps in our understanding of these sources are highlighted, along with an indication of how LISA could help making progress in the different areas. New research avenues that LISA itself, or its joint exploitation with upcoming studies in the electromagnetic domain, will enable, are also illustrated. Improvements in modeling and analysis approaches, such as the combination of numerical simulations and modern data science techniques, are discussed. This review is intended to be a starting point for using LISA as a new discovery tool for understanding our Universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 · Cited by 14,151
Self-citationGalactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the contents and survey properties
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., Eyer, L., et al. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 · Cited by 8,442
Self-citationOn the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 · Cited by 5,116
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics
Arnold, V. I. (1978) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1693-1 · Cited by 5,106
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation
Press, W. H., & Schechter, P. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152650 · Cited by 4,916
A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies
Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312838 · Cited by 4,417
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
Self-citationFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole
The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., Asada, K., Azulay, R., Baczko, A.-K., Ball, D., Baloković, M., Barrett, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 · Cited by 4,205
Self-citation
Cited by
Polariton Fluids as Quantum Field Theory Simulators on Tailored Curved Spacetimes
Falque, K., Delhom, A., Glorieux, Q., Giacobino, E., Bramati, A., & Jacquet, M. J. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/t5dh-rx6w · Cited by 20
What drives the growth of black holes: A decade of progress
Alexander, D. M., Hickox, R. C., Aird, J., Combes, F., Costa, T., Habouzit, M., Harrison, C. M., Leng, R. I., Morabito, L. K., Uckelman, S. L., et al. (2025) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., Berti, E., Bianchi, S., Blecha, L., Blondin, S., Bogdanović, T., Boissier, S., Bonetti, M., Bonoli, S., Bortolas, E., Breivik, K., Capelo, P. R., Caramete, L., Cattorini, F., Charisi, M., Chaty, S., Chen, X., Chruślińska, M., Chua, A. J. K., Church, R., Colpi, M., D’Orazio, D., Danielski, C., Davies, M. B., Dayal, P., De Rosa, A., Derdzinski, A., Destounis, K., Dotti, M., Duţan, I., Dvorkin, I., Fabj, G., Foglizzo, T., Ford, S., Fouvry, J.-B., Franchini, A., Fragos, T., Fryer, C., Gaspari, M., Gerosa, D., Graziani, L., Groot, P., Habouzit, M., Haggard, D., Haiman, Z., Han, W.-B., Istrate, A., Johansson, P. H., Khan, F. M., Kimpson, T., Kokkotas, K., Kong, A., Korol, V., Kremer, K., Kupfer, T., Lamberts, A., Larson, S., Lau, M., Liu, D., Lloyd-Ronning, N., Lodato, G., Lupi, A., Ma, C.-P., Maccarone, T., Mandel, I., Mangiagli, A., Mapelli, M., Mathis, S., Mayer, L., McGee, S., McKernan, B., Miller, M. C., Mota, D. F., Mumpower, M., Nasim, S. S., Nelemans, G., Noble, S., Pacucci, F., Panessa, F., Paschalidis, V., Pfister, H., Porquet, D., Quenby, J., Ricarte, A., Röpke, F. K., Regan, J., Rosswog, S., Ruiter, A., Ruiz, M., Runnoe, J., Schneider, R., Schnittman, J., Secunda, A., Sesana, A., Seto, N., Shao, L., Shapiro, S., Sopuerta, C., Stone, N. C., Suvorov, A., Tamanini, N., Tamfal, T., Tauris, T., Temmink, K., Tomsick, J., Toonen, S., Torres-Orjuela, A., Toscani, M., Tsokaros, A., Unal, C., Vázquez-Aceves, V., Valiante, R., van Putten, M., van Roestel, J., Vignali, C., Volonteri, M., Wu, K., Younsi, Z., Yu, S., Zane, S., Zwick, L., Antonini, F., Baibhav, V., Barausse, E., Bonilla Rivera, A., Branchesi, M., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Burdge, K., Chakraborty, S., Cuadra, J., Dage, K., Davis, B., de Mink, S. E., Decarli, R., Doneva, D., Escoffier, S., Gandhi, P., Haardt, F., Lousto, C. O., Nissanke, S., Nordhaus, J., O’Shaughnessy, R., Portegies Zwart, S., Pound, A., Schussler, F., Sergijenko, O., Spallicci, A., Vernieri, D., & Vigna-Gómez, A.
- Venue
- Living Reviews in Relativity
- Published
- 2023-03-14
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1433-8351
- OpenAlex
- W4293022516
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 1,010
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y
- The paper
- Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., Berti, E., Bianchi, S., Blecha, L., Blondin, S., Bogdanović, T., Boissier, S., Bonetti, M., Bonoli, S., Bortolas, E., . . . Vigna-Gómez, A. (2023). Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. Living Reviews in Relativity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.