Cited by 5Sleep and Work-Related FatigueWorkplace Health and Well-beingWork-Family Balance Challenges

Unterschiedliche psychosoziale Effekte unterschiedlicher Schichtsysteme

Nachreiner, Friedhelm, Arlinghaus, Anna, Horn, Daniela·2019·Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41449-018-00139-6

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nachreiner, F., Arlinghaus, A., & Horn, D.
Affiliations
Gesellschaft für Arbeits-, Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologische Forschung e.V. (DE)
Corresponding author
Nachreiner, Friedhelm
Venue
Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
203-213
ISSN
  • 0340-2444 (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-4681
OpenAlex
W2907717401
Cited by
5
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
shift work, social participation (health and rehabilitation), work-life balance, psychosocial impact, shift workers, chemical industry workers, burnout, job satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review