Cited by 28Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

De flexibiliteits index test (FIT-60): Een Beknopte Beschrijving

Batink, T., Jansen, G., de Mey, H.·2012·GZ - Psychologie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41480-012-0043-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batink, T., Jansen, G., & de Mey, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Batink, T.
Venue
GZ - Psychologie
Published
2012-07
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
18-21
ISSN
  • 1879-5080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-5099
OpenAlex
W2475105015
Cited by
28
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
nl
Open access
closed
Locations
GZ - Psychologie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexibility, psychometric properties, questionnaire development, treatment monitoring, treatment selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review