CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

Burying the ‘Power Few’: Language and Resistance to Evidence-Based Policing

Open access
Sherman, Lawrence W.·2019·Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing
DOI 10.1007/s41887-019-00038-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41887-019-00038-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are greater concentrations in a smaller number of mixed offenders and co-offenders than among solo offenders.

    “Based on analyses of the 'felonious few' (Sherman, 2019; see also Sherman, 2007 ) - offenders responsible for a disproportionate ratio of crime counts or crime harm out of all offenders in the dataset - we find greater concentrations in a smaller number of mixed offenders and co-offenders than among solo offenders.”

    From The Compounding Effect: How Co-Offending Exacerbates the Harm Caused by Violent Offenders (2024) · cites this paper as Sherman, 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, L. W.
Corresponding author
Sherman, Lawrence W.
ORCID
Sherman, Lawrence W.
Venue
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-10-24
Volume
3
Issue
3-4
Pages
73-79
ISSN
  • 2520-1336 (ISSN-L)
  • 2520-1344
DOI
10.1007/s41887-019-00038-8
OpenAlex
W2981481104
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
evidence-based policing, language and resistance, science in everyday life, domestic violence, call-in radio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review