Cited by 183Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

The power few: experimental criminology and the reduction of harm: The 2006 Joan McCord Prize Lecture

Open access
Sherman, Lawrence W.·2007·Journal of Experimental Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-007-9044-y

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are greater concentrations in a smaller number of mixed offenders and co-offenders than among solo offenders.

    “Based on analyses of the 'felonious few' (Sherman, 2019; see also Sherman, 2007 ) - offenders responsible for a disproportionate ratio of crime counts or crime harm out of all offenders in the dataset - we find greater concentrations in a smaller number of mixed offenders and co-offenders than among solo offenders.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, L. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Sherman, Lawrence W.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2007-11-09
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
299-321
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
OpenAlex
W1572246188
Cited by
183
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
experimental criminology, statistical power, harm reduction, sample homogeneity, base rates, intervention dosage, punishment, crime prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review