Biologia Futura: landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation
Open accessAbstract
European nature conservation has a strong focus on farmland harbouring threatened species that mainly co-occur with traditional agriculture shaped way before the green revolution. Increased land-use intensity in agriculture has caused an alarming decline in farmland biodiversity during the last century. How can a landscape perspective contribute to fostering our understanding on causes and consequences of farmland biodiversity decline and improving the effectiveness of conservation measures? To answer these questions, we discuss the importance of landscape compositional and configurational heterogeneity, understanding ecological mechanisms determining how landscape structure affects farmland biodiversity and considering the interplay of farmland biodiversity and ecosystem service conservation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is increasing scientific evidence for the need to closely link landscape ecology with agroecology to move towards the transformation of agricultural systems.
“There is increasing scientific evidence for the need to closely link landscape ecology with agroecology to move towards the transformation of agricultural systems (Batáry etal., 2020).”
From Agroecological planning of productive systems with functional connectivity to the ecological landscape matrix: two Colombian case studies (2024) · cites this paper as Batáry et al., 2020
Cites
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · see citing works
Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change
Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax3100 · Cited by 2,773 · see citing works
Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes
Fahrig, L., Baudry, J., Brotons, L., Burel, F. G., Crist, T. O., Fuller, R. J., Sirami, C., Siriwardena, G. M., & Martin, J. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x · Cited by 1,818 · see citing works
Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
Kleijn, D., Winfree, R., Bartomeus, I., Carvalheiro, L. G., Henry, M., Isaacs, R., Klein, A.-M., Kremen, C., M'Gonigle, L. K., Rader, R., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8414 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
Self-citationLandscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis
Batáry, P., Báldi, A., Kleijn, D., & Tscharntke, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1923 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Self-citationPerennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes
Werling, B. P., Dickson, T. L., Isaacs, R., Gaines, H., Gratton, C., Gross, K. L., Liere, H., Malmstrom, C. M., Meehan, T. D., Ruan, L., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1309492111 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acevedo-Osorio, Á., Cárdenas, J. S., & Martín-Pérez, A. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1257540 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Batáry, P., Báldi, A., Ekroos, J., Gallé, R., Grass, I., & Tscharntke, T.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Ecology and Botany (HU)
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Batáry, Péter
- Venue
- Biologia Futura
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 9-18
- ISSN
- 2676-8607 (ISSN-L)
- 2676-8615
- OpenAlex
- W3033149525
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biologia Futura (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
- Keywords
- farmland biodiversity, biodiversity conservation, landscape heterogeneity, landscape composition, landscape configuration, land use intensity, agricultural intensification, threatened species, conservation effectiveness, ecosystem services, traditional agriculture
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Europe, Humans, Biodiversity, Endangered Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review