Cited by 460Bioenergy crop production and managementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes

Open access
Werling, Ben P., Dickson, Timothy L., Isaacs, Rufus, Gaines, Hannah, Gratton, Claudio, Gross, Katherine L., Liere, Heidi, Malmstrom, Carolyn M. +9 more·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Science-based polices are needed to inform sustainable bioenergy landscape design. Our key finding is that the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem services is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to other habitats. The implication is that careful design of bioenergy landscapes has the potential to enhance multiple services in food and energy crops, leading to important synergies that have not yet informed the ongoing bioenergy debate. This study is especially timely as high commodity prices are driving conversion of marginal lands to annual crop production, reducing future flexibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1309492111

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Growing Miscanthus had much less negative impact on biodiversity than annual crops mainly because perennial cultivations provide relatively stable habitats for supporting wildlife.

    “growing Miscanthus had much less negative impact on biodiversity than annual crops mainly because perennial cultivations provide relatively stable habitats for supporting wild life”

    From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Werling et al. 2013

  • Biodiversity could influence provisioning (food, water), supporting (habitat) and regulating services (soil quality).

    “Biodiversity could influence provisioning (food, water), supporting (habitat) and regulating services (soil quality) [25,43,85].”
  • Land conversions may affect habitat availability, species abundance and diversity, especially in the early state of crop establishment period and particularly for natural ecosystem conversions.

    “Land conversions may affect habitat availability, species abundance and diversity, especially in the early state of crop establishment period and particularly for natural ecosystem conversions [43,97].”
  • Compared with annual crops, perennials require less soil disturbance, fertilizer and herbicide uses, which can reduce risks of environmental pollution.

    “For example, compared with annul crops, perennials require less soil disturbance, fertilizer and herbicide uses, which can reduce risks of environmental pollution [40,43].”
  • The production of second-generation bioenergy (biomass based) tends to affect biodiversity less than that of first generation (e.g., sugar, starch, or vegetable oil based).

    “The production of second-generation bioenergy (biomass based) tends to affect biodiversity less than that of first generation (e.g., sugar, starch, or vegetable oil based).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werling, B. P., Dickson, T. L., Isaacs, R., Gaines, H., Gratton, C., Gross, K. L., Liere, H., Malmstrom, C. M., Meehan, T. D., Ruan, L., Robertson, B. A., Robertson, G. P., Schmidt, T. M., Schrotenboer, A. C., Teal, T. K., Wilson, J. K., & Landis, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (US)
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Trinity Christian College (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-01-13
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
1652-1657
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2028849195
Cited by
460
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 17
FWCI
93.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@UNO (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1027253)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (FC02-07ER64494, DE-AC05–76RL01830)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011-67009-30137, DE-FC02-07ER64494)
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (DE-FC02-07ER64494, #2011-67009-30137)
  • Office of Science (FC02-07ER64494)
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DE‐FC02‐07ER64494)
  • Division of Environmental Biology (1027253)
  • Biomass Program
  • Biological and Environmental Research (DE-AC05-76 RL01830, DE-FC02-07ER64494)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
perennial energy crops, switchgrass, marginal land, ecosystem services, maize, methanotrophic bacteria, methane uptake, arthropod diversity, bird diversity, pollination, pest suppression, landscape context, bioenergy policy
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Energy Resources, Poaceae, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review