Cited by 28Endometriosis Research and TreatmentUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyGynecological conditions and treatments

Diagnosing deep endometriosis using transvaginal elastosonography

Ding, Ding, Chen, Yishan, Liu, Xishi, Jiang, Zongqin, Cai, Xianjun, Guo, Sun-Wei·2020·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and MRI are currently two mainstream imaging techniques used to diagnose deep endometriosis (DE) with comparable accuracy, but there is still ample room for improvement. As endometriotic lesions progress to fibrosis concomitant with the increase in tissue stiffness, transvaginal elastosonography (TVESG) is well-suited for diagnosing DE. To test the hypothesis that lesional stiffness as measured by TVESG correlates with the extent of lesional fibrosis, the markers of progression, hormonal receptor expression, and vascularity, we recruited 30 patients suspected to have DE who went through pelvic examination, TVUS and/or MRI, and TVESG and were ultimately diagnosed by histology. Their lesional tissue samples were subjected to immunohistochemistry analysis of markers for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation (FMT), estrogen and progesterone receptors (ERβ and PR), microvessel density (MVD), and vascularity, as well as quantification of lesional fibrosis. We found that pelvic examination, TVUS, and MRI detected 83.3%, 66.7%, and 83.3% of all DE cases, respectively, while TVESG detected them all. The lesions missed by pelvic exam, TVUS and MRI were significantly smaller than those detected but nonetheless had higher lesional stiffness. Lesional stiffness correlated closely and positively with the extent of lesional fibrosis, negatively with the markers of EMT, MVD, vascularity, and PR expression, but positively with the marker for FMT and ERβ. Thus, through the additional use of information on differential stiffness between DE lesions and their surrounding tissues, TVESG improves diagnostic accuracy, provides a ballpark estimate on the developmental stage of the lesions, and may help clinicians choose the best treatment modality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43032-019-00108-2

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, D., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Jiang, Z., Cai, X., & Guo, S.-W.
Affiliations
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Xishi
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
1411-1422
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W3019693459
Cited by
28
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, tissue stiffness, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation, estrogen receptor beta, progesterone receptor, microvessel density, lesion vascularity, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Vagina, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review