Cited by 25Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Health and TechnologiesEndometriosis Research and Treatment

A Systematic Review of the Psychosocial Impact of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Before and After Treatment

Rempert, Ashley N., Sarria, Isabella, Standeven, Lindsay R., Nylander, Elizabeth, Segars, James, Singh, Bhuchitra·2023·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

While polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common hormonal endocrine disorders among women of reproductive age, the psychosocial impact of PCOS has not been evaluated across different quality of life (QoL) indicators. We rigorously analyzed available evidence pertaining to the psychosocial burden of PCOS in women of reproductive age and compared validated QoL scores of women with and without PCOS before and after treatment. We searched and considered publications from PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library that evaluated the association between diagnosed PCOS and QoL by standardized and validated questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. Reviewers assessed the risk of bias using established Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. A total of 33 studies were included in the review: 14 randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies. The 36-Item Short Form Survey and World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF questionnaire both revealed that the diagnosis and life experience of PCOS had a disability score that was similar to or surpassed that of heart disease, diabetes mellitus, or breast cancer. QoL scores, associated with mental health issues, infertility, sexual dysfunction, obesity, menstrual disorder, and hirsutism, were lower at the baseline than after treatment in the majority of instruments measuring these variables in women with PCOS. PCOS is associated with significant psychosocial stress and reduced QoL across baseline measures and in comparison, to other diseases. Evidence suggests that treatment with therapy, medications, and lifestyle management decreased psychosocial burdens and alleviated QoL experienced by women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43032-023-01285-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rempert, A. N., Sarria, I., Standeven, L. R., Nylander, E., Segars, J., & Singh, B.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Singh, Bhuchitra
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2023-06-21
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
3153-3178
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W4381470467
Cited by
25
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, psychosocial impact, quality of life, women of reproductive age, PCOS treatment, infertility, hirsutism, sexual dysfunction, obesity, menstrual disorders, mental health, disability burden, lifestyle management
MeSH terms
Female, Hirsutism, Humans, Infertility, Life Style, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review