CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Avian ecology and behaviorEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesEcology and biodiversity studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bird dependence on wetlands determines functional responses to flood pulse in the Brazilian Pantanal

Open access
Frota, Angélica Vilas Boas, Vitorino, Breno Dias, Almeida, Sara Miranda, da Silva Nunes, Josué Ribeiro, da Silva, Carolina Joana·2022·Ornithology Research
DOI 10.1007/s43388-022-00102-4

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43388-022-00102-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Almeida BA, Gimenes MR, dos Anjos L (2016) Wading bird functional diversity in a floodplain: influence of habitat type and hydrological cycle. Austral Ecol 42:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12403 · DOI
  2. Almeida BA, Green AJ, Sebastián-González E, dos Anjos L (2018) Comparing species richness, functional diversity and functional composition of waterbird communities along environmental gradients in the Neotropics. PLoS One 13:e0200959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200959 · DOI
  3. Almeida BA, Sebastián-González E, dos Anjos L, Green AJ, Botella F (2019) A functional perspective for breeding and wintering waterbird communities: temporal trends in species and trait diversity. Oikos 128:1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05903 · DOI
  4. Almeida BA, Sebastián-González E, dos Anjos L, Green AJ (2020) Comparing the diversity and composition of waterbird functional traits between natural, restored, and artificial wetlands. Freshw Biol 65:2196–2210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13618 · DOI
  5. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 · DOI
  6. Che X, Chen D, Zhang M, Quan Q, Møller AP, Zou F (2019) Seasonal dynamics of waterbird assembly mechanisms revealed by patterns in phylogenetic and functional diversity in a subtropical wetland. Biotropica 51:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12648 · DOI
  7. Davidson NC (2016) Wetland losses and the status of wetland-dependent species. In: Finlayson C, Milton G, Prentice RDN (eds) The wetland book. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–14
  8. Daniel J, Polan H, Rooney RC (2021) Determinants of wetland-bird community composition in agricultural marshes of the Northern Prairie and Parkland Region. Wetlands 41:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01409-6 · DOI
  9. de Deus FF, Schuchmann K-L, Arieira J, de Oliveira Tissiani AS, Marques MI (2020a) Avian beta diversity in a Neotropical wetland: the effects of flooding and vegetation structure. Wetlands 40:1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01240-0 · DOI
  10. de Deus FF, Schuchmann K-L, Marques MI (2020b) Seasonality in the Brazilian Pantanal influences avian functional diversity. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2020.1842043 · DOI
  11. Duarte LDS, Debastiani VJ, Carlucci MB, Diniz-Filho JAF (2018) Analyzing community-weighted trait means across environmental gradients: should phylogeny stay or should it go? Ecology 99:385–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2081 · DOI
  12. Figueira JEC, Mourão FA, Coelho AS (2011) Habitat heterogeneity and climatic seasonality structure the avifauna trophic guilds in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland. Can J Zool 89:1206–1213. https://doi.org/10.1139/z11-099 · DOI
  13. Frota AVB de, Ikeda-castrillon SK, Kantek DLZ, Silva CJ (2017) Macrohabitats da Estação Ecológica de Taiamã, no contexto da Área Úmida Pantanal mato-grossense, Brasil. Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi Cienc Nat 12:239–254. https://doi.org/10.46357/bcnaturais.v12i2.387 · DOI
  14. Frota AVB, Vitorino BD, Silva CJ, Ikeda-Castrillon SK, Nunes JRS (2020) Bird community structure in macrohabitats of the aquatic-terrestrial transition zone in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Oecol Aust 24:615–634. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2020.2403.07 · DOI
  15. García D (2016) Birds in ecological networks: insights from bird-plant mutualistic interactions. Ardeola 63:5–34. https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.63.1.2016.rp7 · DOI
  16. Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0799 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Green AJ, Elmberg J (2013) Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds. Biol Rev 89:105–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12045 · DOI
  18. Guerra A, de Oliviera Roque F, Garcia LC, Ochao-Quintero JMO, de Oliveira PTS, Guariento RD, Rosa IMD (2020) Drivers and projections of vegetation loss in the Pantanal and surrounding ecosystems. Land Use Policy 91:104388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104388 · DOI
  19. Gupta G, Khan J, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK (2020) Wetland as a sustainable reservoir of ecosystem services: prospects of threat and conservation. In: Upadhyay A, Singh R, Singh D (eds) Restoration of wetland ecosystem: a trajectory towards a sustainable environment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7665-8_3 · DOI
  20. Jahn AE, Cueto VR, Fontana CS, Guaraldo AC, Levey DJ, Marra PP, Ryder TB (2020) Bird migration within the Neotropics. Auk 137:ukaa033. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukaa033 · DOI
  21. Junk WJ, Da Silva CJ (1996) O conceito do Pulso de Inundação e suas implicações para o Pantanal de Mato Grosso. Anais do Simpósio sobre Recursos Naturais e Socioeconômicos do Pantanal: Manejo e Conservação 2:17–28
  22. Junk WJ, Da Cunha CN, Wantzen KM, Petermann P, Strüssmann C, Marques MI, Adis J (2006) Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat Sci 68:278–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-006-0851-4 · DOI
  23. Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Lourival R, Wittmann F, Kandus P, Lacerda LD, Bozelli RL, Esteves FA, Nunes da Cunha C, Maltchik L, Schöngart J, Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Agostinho AA (2014) Brazilian wetlands: their definition, delineation, and classification for research, sustainable management, and protection. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 24:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2386 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kantek DLZ, Melo RC, Miyazaki SS, Castilheiro WFF, Santos-Filho M (2020) Aquatic birds at the Taiamã Ecological Station: seasonal variation of community structure and the importance of protected areas in the Pantanal. Biodivers Bras 10:24–40. https://doi.org/10.37002/biobrasil.v10i3.1513 · DOI
  25. Keppeler FW, Cruz DA, Dalponti G, Mormul RP (2016) The role of deterministic factors and stochasticity on the trophic interactions between birds and fish in temporary floodplain ponds. Hydrobiologia 773:225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2705-y · DOI
  26. Kleyheeg E, Fiedler W, Safi K, Waldenström J, Wikelski M, van Toor ML (2019) A comprehensive model for the quantitative estimation of seed dispersal by migratory mallards. Front Ecol Evol 7:205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00040 · DOI
  27. Laliberte E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1 · DOI
  28. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, McIntyre S, Williams NSG, Garden D, Dorrough J, Berman S, Quétier F, Thébault A, Bonis A (2008) Assessing functional diversity in the field—methodology matters! Funct Ecol 22:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01339.x · DOI
  29. Lázaro WL, Oliveira-Júnior ES, da Silva CJ, Castrillon SKI, Muniz CC (2020) Climate change reflected in one of the largest wetlands in the world: an overview of the northern Pantanal water regime. Acta Limnol Bras 32:e104. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x7619 · DOI
  30. Le S, Josse J, Husson F (2008). FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25:i01. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 · DOI
  31. Leal CG, Lennox GD, Ferraz SFB, Ferreira J, Gardner TA, Thomson JR, Berenguer E, Lees AC, Hughes RM, MacNally R, Aragão LEOC, de Brito JG, Castello L, Garrett RD, Hamada N, Juen L, Leitão RP, Louzada J, Morello TF, Moura NG, Nessimian JL, Oliveira-Junior JMB, Oliveira VHF, de Oliveira VC, Parry L, Pompeu PS, Solar RRC, Zuanon J, Barlow J (2020) Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species. Science 370:117–121. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7580 · DOI
  32. Libonati R, Dacamara CC, Peres L, Carvalho LAS, Garcia LC (2020) Rescue Brazil’s burning Pantanal wetlands. Nature 588:217–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03464-1 · DOI
  33. Lorenzón RE, Ronchi-Virgolini AL, Blake JG (2020) Wetland dependency drives temporal turnover of bird species between high- and low-water years in floodplain wetlands of the Paraná River. Ecohydrology 13:e2177. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2179 · DOI
  34. Lovas-Kiss Á, Vincze O, Kleyheeg E, Sramkó G, Laczkó L, Fekete R, Molnár VA, Green AJ (2020) Seed mass, hardness, and phylogeny explain the potential for endozoochory by granivorous waterbirds. Ecol Evol 10:1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5997 · DOI
  35. Luck GW, Lavorel S, Mcintyre S, Lumb K (2012) Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. J Anim Ecol 81:1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01974.x · DOI
  36. Luck GW, Carter A, Smallbone L (2013) Changes in bird functional diversity across multiple land uses: interpretations of functional redundancy depend on functional group identity. PLoS ONE 8:e63671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063671 · DOI
  37. Marengo JA, Cunha AP, Cuartas LA, Leal KRD, Broedel E, Seluchi ME, Michelin CM, Flávia C, Baião DP, Ângulo EC, Almeida EK (2021) Extreme drought in the Brazilian Pantanal in 2019–2020: characterization, causes, and impacts. Front Water 3:639204. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.639204 · DOI
  38. Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13886.x · DOI
  39. Matuoka MA, Benchimol M, Morante-Filho JC (2020) Tropical forest loss drives divergent patterns in functional diversity of forest and non-forest birds. Biotropica 52:738–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12795 · DOI
  40. Mega ER (2020) ‘Apocalyptic’ fires tropical wetland. Nature 586:20–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02716-4 · DOI
  41. Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Hernandez ME (2015) Ecosystem services of wetlands. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 11:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1006250 · DOI
  42. Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010) Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol 24:867–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01695.x · DOI
  43. Mouillot D, Graham NAJ, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Bellwood DR (2013) A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol Evol 28:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Norris K, Terry A, Hansford JP, Turvey ST (2020) Biodiversity conservation and the earth system: mind the gap. Trends Ecol Evol 35:919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.010 · DOI
  45. Olivo-Neto AM, da Silva CJ, Ikeda-Castrillon SK, Lazaro WL, Damasceno-Junior GA, Gris D, Pereira TDC, Sander NL (2020) Spatial distribution of single specie dominant forests of Erythrina fusca Lour. at the Taiamã Ecological Station, Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Trop Ecol 61:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00081-x · DOI
  46. Pacheco JF, Silveira LF, Aleixo A, Agne CE, Bencke GA, Bravo GA, Brito GRR, Cohn-Haft M, Maurício GN, Naka LN, Olmos F, Posso SR, Lees AC, Figueiredo LFA, Carrano E, Guedes RC, Cesari E, Franz I, Schunck F, Piacentini VQ (2021) Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee—second edition. Ornithol Res 29:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x · DOI
  47. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x · DOI
  48. Pinho JB, Aragona M, Hakamada KYP, Marini MA (2017) Migration patterns and seasonal forest use by birds in the Brazilian Pantanal. Bird Conserv Int 27:371–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959270916000290 · DOI
  49. Pinho JB, Marini MÂ (2014) Birds’ nesting parameters in four forest types in the Pantanal wetland. Braz J Biol 74:890–898. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.08713 · DOI
  50. Pivello VR, Vieira I, Christianini AV, Ribeiro DB, Silva ML, Berlinck CN, Melo FPL, Marengo JA, Tornquist CG, Tomas WM, Overbeck GE (2021) Understanding Brazil’s catastrophic fires: causes, consequences and policy needed to prevent future tragedies. Perspect Ecol Conserv 19:233–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.06.005 · DOI
  51. Russell A, Lenth V, Buerkner P, Herve M, Love J, Singmann H, Lenth MR V (2022) Package ‘emmeans’ R topics documented 34:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031 · DOI
  52. Sekercioglu CH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2004) Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18042–18047. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408049101 · DOI
  53. Setubal RB, Petry AC, Bonecker CC, Martins T, Nova CC, Figueiredo-Barros MP, Bozelli RL (2020) Biotic factors determine ecosystem processes in environments with different hydrological regimes. Freshw Biol 65:1376–1391. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13506 · DOI
  54. Sherry TW, Kent CM, Sánchez NV, Şekercioğlu ÇH (2020) Insectivorous birds in the Neotropics: ecological radiations, specialization, and coexistence in species-rich communities. Auk 137:ukaa049. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukaa049 · DOI
  55. Silva GG, Green AJ, Hoffman P, Weber V, Stenert C, Leonardo ÁL (2020) Seed dispersal by neotropical waterfowl depends on bird species and seasonality. Freshw Biol 66:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13615 · DOI
  56. Somenzari M, Amaral PP, Cueto VR, Guaraldo ADC, Jahn AE, Lima DM, Lima PC, Lugarini C, Machado CG, Martinez J, Nascimento JLX, Pacheco JF, Paludo D, Prestes NP, Serafini PP, Silveira LF, Sousa AEBA, Sousa NA, Souza MA, Telino-Júnior WR, Whitney BM (2018) An overview of migratory birds in Brazil. Pap Avulsos Zool 58:e20185803. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2018.58.03 · DOI
  57. Souza CM Jr, Shimbo JZ, Rosa MR, Parente LL, Alencar AA, Rudorff BFT, Hasenack H, Matsumoto M, Ferreira LG, Souza-Filho PWM, de Oliveira SW, Rocha WF, Fonseca AV, Marques CB, Diniz CG, Costa D, Monteiro D, Rosa ER, Vélez-Martin E, Weber EJ, Lenti FEB, Paternost FF, Pareyn FGC, Siqueira JV, Viera JL, Neto LCF, Saraiva MM, Sales MH, Salgado MPG, Vasconcelos R, Galano S, Mesquita VV, Azevedo T (2020) Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine. Remote Sens 12:2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS12172735 · DOI
  58. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. Thomas KPCS, Bueno ER, Teixido AL, Pinho JB (2020) Seasonality determines bird abundance, richness, and diversity among contrasting forest environments in the Northern Pantanal. Ornithol Res 28:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-020-00006-1 · DOI
  60. Tilman D (2001) Functional diversity. Encycl Biodivers 3:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-226865-2/00132-2 · DOI
  61. Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290200022X · DOI
  62. Van Leeuwen CHA, Lovas-Kiss Á, Ovegård M, Green AJ (2017) Great cormorants reveal overlooked secondary dispersal of plants and invertebrates by piscivorous waterbirds. Biol Lett 13:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0406 · DOI
  63. Vieira BP (2017) Conceitos utilizados no Brasil para aves aquáticas. Atual Ornitol 196:41–48
  64. Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290–2301. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1206.1 · DOI
  65. Wantzen KM, Drago E, Silva CJ (2005) Aquatic habitats of the Upper Paraguay river-floodplain-system and parts of the Pantanal (Brazil). Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 5:107–126. https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_SI.2011.CTuM6 · DOI
  66. Wetlands International (2012) Waterbird population estimates, 5th edn. Wageningen, The Netherlands
  67. Whelan CJ, Wenny DG, Marquis RJ (2008) Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1134:25–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003 · DOI
  68. Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 28:453–470. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00563.x · DOI
  69. Wickham H (2016) Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York · DOI
  70. Wilkinson DM, Lovas-Kiss A, Callaghan DA, Green AJ (2017) Endozoochory of large bryophyte fragments by waterbirds. Cryptogam Bryol 38:223–228. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb/v38.iss2.2017.223 · DOI
  71. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de La Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W (2014) EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027 https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1917.1 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Frota, A. V. B., Vitorino, B. D., Almeida, S. M., da Silva Nunes, J. R., & da Silva, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Ornithology Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-07-20
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
190-203
ISSN
2662-673X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/s43388-022-00102-4
OpenAlex
W4286009727
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Ornithology Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (441563/2016-3)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
flood pulse, functional traits, waterbirds, Pantanal, hydrological periods, species richness, bird abundance, floodplain birds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review