Cited by 3Risk Perception and ManagementDisaster Management and ResiliencePublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Teenagers’ risk perception and awareness in the context of cultural bias and prior earthquake event in Iran

Kazemi, Nasrin, Badri, Seyed Ali, Adinehvand, Esmail, Rostami, Kazem·2022·SN Social Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43545-022-00567-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazemi, N., Badri, S. A., Adinehvand, E., & Rostami, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author
Kazemi, Nasrin
Venue
SN Social Sciences
Published
2022-11-25
Volume
2
Issue
12
ISSN
2662-9283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310078994
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SN Social Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
adolescents, risk perception, risk awareness, cultural bias, earthquakes, risk communication, disaster preparedness, risk mitigation, social influence, Iran

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review