Cited by 98Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesGraphene research and applications

Structure-oriented conversions of plastics to carbon nanomaterials

Open access
Ren, Shiying, Xu, Xin, Hu, Kunsheng, Tian, Wenjie, Duan, Xiaoguang, Yi, Jiabao, Wang, Shaobin·2022·Carbon Research

Abstract

The accumulation of waste plastics has caused serious environmental issues due to their unbiodegradable nature and hazardous additives. Converting waste plastics to different carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) is a promising approach to minimize plastic pollution and realize advanced manufacturing of CNMs. The reported plastic-derived carbons include carbon filaments (i.e. carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers), graphene, carbon nanosheets, carbon sphere, and porous carbon. In this review, we present the influences of different intrinsic structures of plastics on the pyrolysis intermediates. We also reveal that non-charring plastics are prone to being pyrolyzed into light hydrocarbons while charring plastics are prone to being pyrolyzed into aromatics. Subsequently, light hydrocarbons favor to form graphite while aromatics are inclined to form amorphous carbon during the carbon formation process. In addition, the conversion tendency of different plastics into various morphologies of carbon is concluded. We also discuss other impact factors during the transformation process, including catalysts, temperature, processing duration and templates, and reveal how to obtain different morphological CNMs from plastics. Finally, current technology limitations and perspectives are presented to provide future research directions in effective plastic conversion and advanced CNM synthesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44246-022-00016-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to Cu, Ni's low carbon source solubility has stronger chemical adsorption on graphene and is easier to form graphene.

    “Compared to Cu, Ni's low carbon source solubility has a stronger chemical adsorption on graphene and is easier to form graphene (Ren et al. 2022).”

    From Conversion of waste plastics into value-added carbon materials (2023) · cites this paper as Ren et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 128 · Cited by 98

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Orbaek White A Hedayati A Yick T Gangoli VS Niu Y Lethbridge S Tsampanakis I Swan G Pointeaux L Crane A Charles R Sallah-Conteh J Anderson AO Davies ML Palmer RE Synthesis of carbon nanotubes via liquid injection chemical vapour deposition as a vector for the chemical recycling of waste composite carbon sources Nanomaterials 2022 12 9 10.20944/preprints202111.0483.v1 · DOI

Authors
Ren, S., Xu, X., Hu, K., Tian, W., Duan, X., Yi, J., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Kunsheng
  • Wang, Shaobin
Venue
Carbon Research
Published
2022-08-02
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2731-6696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289522784
Cited by
98
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 4
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Carbon Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP200103206; LP200201079 and DE220101074)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
plastic waste, carbon nanomaterials, pyrolysis, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, graphene, carbon nanosheets, porous carbon, light hydrocarbons, aromatic compounds, graphitization, amorphous carbon, catalysts, templates, plastic pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review