Cited by 8Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

LLM-augmented multi-agent cooperative framework for medical case retrieval in cardiology

Open access
Deng, Lang, Hu, Huanhuan, Lu, Kongjie, He, Ping·2025·Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences

Abstract

Retrieving relevant medical cases or documents is a critical information retrieval (IR) task in clinical decision support, particularly in cardiology, yet traditional search methods struggle with complex semantic queries in healthcare. Recent advances in large language models offer powerful language understanding, but LLMs alone cannot reliably retrieve factual cases due to knowledge cutoffs and hallucinations. We focus on a case retrieval task – given a textual description of a patient case, find similar prior cases or pertinent literature – formulated as a general IR problem rather than a purely medical study. Conventional lexical methods often miss semantic similarities, while static dense retrievers falter on out-of-domain medical vocabularies. LLMs can comprehend queries and context, but without external knowledge they may produce inaccurate or non-transparent results. We propose a novel LLM-augmented multi-agent retrieval framework that marries an LLM with dedicated retrieval agents in an iterative cooperation mechanism. Our method uses a LLM as a “planner” agent to reformulate queries and integrate medical (e.g., cardiology) context, and a retrieval agent (with a knowledge index) to fetch candidate cases; the agents interact iteratively, refining search and reranking results via a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) loop. This multi-agent design contributes three innovations: (1) an iterative query refinement strategy guided by LLM reasoning chains; (2) a cooperative retrieval architecture where an LLM agent and a search agent exchange information to improve relevance; (3) an LLM-based relevance estimator that grounds the LLM with retrieved evidence to mitigate hallucinations. Experiments on three open medical text datasets show our method outperforms baseline models by 5.3–6.1 percentage points in Recall@10 and NDCG, with statistically significant gains. We also observe improved generalization to novel conditions and robustness to query noise compared to baselines. The proposed framework, while validated on medical text, is broadly applicable to other knowledge-intensive retrieval tasks (legal case search, technical support archives), providing a foundation for intelligent IR systems that leverage both learning-based understanding and explicit retrieval for transparency and up-to-date knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44443-025-00311-z

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shifted toward multi-agent architectures, where multiple specialised agents collaborate through structured communication to enhance reasoning and reliability.

    “To overcome these limitations, research has shifted toward multiagent architectures, where multiple specialised agents collaborate through structured communication to enhance reasoning and reliability.”
  • These include planner, retriever and verifier agent patterns for diagnosis and treatment recommendations, multi-agent conversational frameworks for transparent reasoning and multi-agent RAG systems for medical question answering.

    “These include planner, retriever and verifier agent patterns for diagnosis and treatment recommendations [11], multi-agent conversational frameworks for transparent reasoning and multi-agent retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems for medical question answering [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, L., Hu, H., Lu, K., & He, P.
Affiliations
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Ping
Venue
Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences
Published
2025-10-20
Volume
37
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-1248
OpenAlex
W4415358120
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
cardiology, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, query refinement, hallucination mitigation, relevance estimation, clinical decision support, semantic similarity, knowledge cutoff, re-ranking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review