Default prediction and contagion risk assessment in corporate guarantee networks via dynamic heterogeneous graph neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Corporate guarantee networks in China's bond market generate cascading defaults through interconnected guarantee chains, yet conventional credit risk models treat each borrower as an independent unit and cannot capture network-driven contagion. This paper proposes DHGN-Credit, a dynamic heterogeneous graph neural network framework that jointly addresses default prediction and contagion risk assessment in corporate guarantee networks. The framework constructs a directed, weighted heterogeneous graph from actual guarantee contracts and integrates three components: a metapath-aware heterogeneous graph attention network (H-GAT) that distinguishes guarantee, equity, and industry relation types; a continuous-time memory module that captures guarantee events between quarterly snapshots; and an LSTM temporal encoder with adaptive attention weighting. A dual-task decoder jointly optimizes default probability prediction and contagion impact assessment, with the contagion task supplying network-level regularization to the default prediction objective. Experiments on Chinese bond market data spanning 2015–2024 (3,842 firms, 152 defaults), conducted under a disclosure-aligned feature lag that restricts each snapshot to financials publicly available at the snapshot date, show that DHGN-Credit achieves an AUC of 0.913 and F1-score of 0.656, improving over the strongest dynamic baseline by 3.4 and 5.5 percentage points respectively, and attains a Spearman rank correlation of 0.865 on contagion impact prediction. Phase transition analysis confirms robust-yet-fragile behavior: targeted attacks on 50 core firms trigger contagion at 8.2 times the scale of equivalent random shocks, with a discontinuous inflection near a 30% leverage threshold.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Interpretable machine learning for imbalanced credit scoring datasets
Chen, Y., Calabrese, R., & Martin-Barragan, B. (2024) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.036 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Mitigation of cascading failures in complex networks
Smolyak, A., Levy, O., Vodenska, I., Buldyrev, S., & Havlin, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72771-4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yang, S., & Liu, X.
- Affiliations
- China Three Gorges University (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences
- Published
- 2026-06-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1319-1578 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-1248
- OpenAlex
- W7163696377
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- the Hubei Provincial Department of Science and Technology Platform Program Project (2024BSB002)
- the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFD1702005-3)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Keywords
- corporate default prediction, credit contagion, bond market, heterogeneous graph neural networks, dynamic graph neural networks, dual-task learning, network regularization, Chinese bond market
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review