The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evacuation Dynamics: Empirical Results, Modeling and Applications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lattice-gas automata for the Navier-Stokes equation
Frisch, U., Hasslacher, B., & Pomeau, Y. (1986) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.1505 · Cited by 2,788
Cited by
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters
Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016507108 · Cited by 1,204
Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions
Zhang, J., Klingsch, W., Schadschneider, A., & Seyfried, A. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/06/p06004 · Cited by 419
COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM ACROSS CULTURES
CHATTARAJ, U., SEYFRIED, A., & CHAKROBORTY, P. (2009) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525909002209 · Cited by 318
Unblinking eyes: The ethics of automating surveillance
Macnish, K. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9291-0 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Venue
- SpringerReference
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Published
- 2011-08-29
- OpenAlex
- W2963993701
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
