The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM ACROSS CULTURES
Abstract
The relation between speed and density is connected with every self-organization phenomenon of pedestrian dynamics and offers the opportunity to analyze them quantitatively. But even for the simplest systems, like pedestrian streams in corridors, this fundamental relation is not completely understood. A comparison of data from literature shows that specifications in text books as well as measurements under various experimental conditions differ significantly. In this contribution it is studied whether cultural influences and length of the corridor can be the causes for these deviations. To reduce as much as possible unintentional effects, a system is chosen with reduced degrees of freedom and thus the most simple system, namely the movement of pedestrians along a line under closed boundary conditions. It is found that the speed of Indian test persons is less dependent on density than the speed of German test persons. Surprisingly the more unordered behavior of the Indians is more effective than the ordered behavior of the Germans. This may be due to differences in their self-organization behavior. Without any statistical measure one cannot conclude about whether there are differences or not. By hypothesis test it is found quantitatively that these differences exist, suggesting cultural differences in the fundamental diagram of pedestrians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering
(2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0 · Cited by 3,803
Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study
Helbing, D., Johansson, A., & Al-Abideen, H. Z. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.046109 · Cited by 1,174
Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks
Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Daamen, W. (2005) · Transportation Science · doi:10.1287/trsc.1040.0102 · Cited by 552
The Fundamental Diagram of Pedestrian Movement Revisited
Seyfried, A., Steffen, B., Klingsch, W., & Boltes, M. (2005) · Cited by 447
Self-citationEvacuation Dynamics: Empirical Results, Modeling and Applications
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_60359 · Cited by 424
Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008
(2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2 · Cited by 404
FROM CROWD DYNAMICS TO CROWD SAFETY: A VIDEO-BASED ANALYSIS
JOHANSSON, A., HELBING, D., AL-ABIDEEN, H. Z., & AL-BOSTA, S. (2008) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525908001854 · Cited by 360
PEDESTRIAN FLOW CHARACTERISTICS
Navin, F., & Wheeler, R. J. (1969) · ITE journal · Cited by 232
Intercultural Study of Personal Space: A Case Study
Beaulieu, C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02571.x · Cited by 127
Cited by
Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions
Zhang, J., Klingsch, W., Schadschneider, A., & Seyfried, A. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/06/p06004 · Cited by 419
Self-citationUnblinking eyes: The ethics of automating surveillance
Macnish, K. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9291-0 · Cited by 69
Traffic flow in a crowd of pedestrians walking at different speeds
Fujita, A., Feliciani, C., Yanagisawa, D., & Nishinari, K. (2019) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.062307 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- CHATTARAJ, U., SEYFRIED, A., & CHAKROBORTY, P.
- Venue
- Advances in Complex Systems
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 393-405
- ISSN
- 0219-5259 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6802
- OpenAlex
- W2045313942
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 32.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM ACROSS CULTURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0219525909002209
- The paper
- CHATTARAJ, U., SEYFRIED, A., & CHAKROBORTY, P. (2009). COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM ACROSS CULTURES. Advances in Complex Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219525909002209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.