Cited by 475Traffic and Road SafetyOlder Adults Driving StudiesOccupational Health and Safety Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers

Jonah, Brian A.·1986·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence relevant to the hypotheses that young (16-25) drivers are at greater risk of being involved in a casualty accident than older drivers and this greater risk is primarily a function of their propensity to take risks while driving. The first hypothesis is clearly supported by epidemiological research even when controlling for differences in the quantity and quality of road travel and driving experience. The second hypothesis is also supported by observational and self-report surveys of driving behaviour. Some of the research and theory bearing on risk perception and risk utility, possible mediators of risk-taking, is also reviewed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90041-2

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bragg, 1982, Younger driver risk-taking research: Technical report of experimental study, Report prepared for National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
  2. Carlson, 1972, Alcohol usage of the nightime driver, J. Safety Research, 4, 12
  3. Perkins, 1984, Restraint system usage in traffic population, Report prepared National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
  4. Statistics Canada, 1983, 1981 Census of Canada: Population by Age, Sex and Marital Status Catalogue 92–901
  5. Wolfe, 1974, 1973 U.S. National roadside breathtesting survey: Procedures and results, Report prepared for National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
  6. Zylman, 1972, Age is more important than alcohol in the collision—involvement of young and old drivers, J. Traffic Safety Education, 20, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jonah, B. A.
Affiliations
Transport Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Jonah, Brian A.
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
255-271
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063588951
Cited by
472
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
33.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Occupational Health and Safety Research
Keywords
young drivers, crash risk, risk-taking, traffic accidents, risk perception, driver behavior
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Intoxication, Automobile Driving, Humans, Risk, Risk-Taking, Seat Belts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review