Cited by 1,304Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics

Wickelgren, Wayne A.·1977·Acta Psychologica

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Garrett, 1922, A study on the relation of accuracy to speed, Archives of Psychology, 56, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,304

Metadata

Authors
Wickelgren, W. A.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Wickelgren, Wayne A.
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-02
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
67-85
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973624057
Cited by
1,304
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 43
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
speed-accuracy trade-off, reaction time, response deadlines, payoffs, perceptual processing, recognition memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review