Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suppression occurs in preparation for trials in which the required stimulus-response mapping is unknown in advance.
“In particular, suppression occurs in preparation for incompatible responses (when the stimulus-compatible response is incorrect) and in preparation for trials in which the required stimulus-response mapping is unknown in advance of the stimulus (when the stimulus-compatible response is incorrect half the time).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong, 1995
Suppression occurs in preparation for incompatible responses.
“In particular, suppression occurs in preparation for incompatible responses (when the stimulus-compatible response is incorrect) and in preparation for trials in which the required stimulus-response mapping is unknown in advance of the stimulus (when the stimulus-compatible response is incorrect half the time).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong, 1995
Preparatory suppression manifests behaviorally as reduced compatibility effects in unknown mapping trials.
“This preparatory suppression manifests behaviorally as reduced compatibility effects in the unknown mapping trials: the compatible response no longer benefits from automatic response activation making compatible and incompatible reaction times similar.”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong, 1995
When the required mapping is known before the stimulus, the automatic response route is suppressed selectively for incompatible trials, so compatible trials have a speed advantage.
“In the alternative, more common scenario—when the required mapping is known before the stimulus—the automatic response route is suppressed selectively for incompatible trials, so that compatible trials have a speed advantage due to automatic response activation (Shaffer, 1965; Heister and Schroeder-Heister, 1994; De Jong, 1995; Vu and Proctor, 2004).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong, 1995
Automatic activation of a stimulus-compatible response can be strategically suppressed when it is likely to interfere with task goals.
“Some cognitive models of SRC suggest that it is possible to strategically suppress the automatic activation of a stimulus-compatible response when this response is likely to interfere with task goals (Shaffer, 1965; De Jong, 1995; Vu and Proctor, 2004).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong, 1995
According to cognitive models of S-R compatibility, an automatic response can be inhibited if it is likely to conflict with task goals.
“Cognitive models of stimulus-response compatibility suggest that although stimuli often activate a compatible response, this “automatic” response activation can be suppressed when it is likely to interfere with task goals (Shaffer, 1965; De Jong, 1995; Vu and Proctor, 2004).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as De Jong, 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- de Jong, R.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-207
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142940130
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- stimulus-response compatibility, task uncertainty, response priming, interference, crosstalk, strategic control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
