Cited by 128Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The circadian blood pressure pattern in ambulatory normal subjects

Weber, Michael A., Drayer, Jan I.M., Nakamura, Dina K., Wyle, Frederic A.·1984·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a portable noninvasive device capable of automatically measuring and recording BP every 7.5 minutes during a 24-hour study period was performed in 34 normal volunteers on 2 separate occasions, 2 to 8 weeks apart, to test the consistency of the whole-day blood pressure pattern. The average of all systolic BPs measured during the second study day was within 10 mm Hg of that measured during the first study day in 79% of the subjects, and the respective diastolic BP averages were within 5 mm Hg of each other in 65% of the subjects; 53% satisfied both of these criteria. The reproducibility of the circadian pattern of the BP was tested by dividing the 24-hour day into 12 consecutive 2-hour BP averages. When the corresponding 2-hour periods on the 2 study days were matched, there were strong correlations (r greater than 0.70) within most subjects for both the systolic and diastolic BP averages of the 2-hour periods (76% and 68% of subjects) and for the relative rank values of the periods (62% and 56%). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the averages (for all subjects together) on the 2 study days of the highest and lowest systolic and diastolic 2-hour BP values; similarly, the times at which these extreme values occurred on the 2 study days corresponded closely. Thus, in normal subjects there is a strong tendency for the circadian pattern and the actual levels of BP to be consistent between 24-hour study periods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90314-x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–128 of 128

Metadata

Authors
Weber, M. A., Drayer, J. I. M., Nakamura, D. K., & Wyle, F. A.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-07
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
115-119
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006629690
Cited by
128
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
circadian blood pressure rhythm, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, reproducibility, normal subjects, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, day-night blood pressure variation
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Diastole, Heart, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Systole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review