Cited by 58Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesGastrointestinal motility and disordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Esophageal manometry in systemic amyloidosis

Rubinow, Alan, Burakoff, Robert, Cohen, Alan S., Harris, Lauran D.·1983·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The motility of the esophagus was studied by esophageal manometry in 24 patients with primary amyloidosis and six with secondary amyloidosis. Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was decreased in 12 patients with primary amyloidosis and two with secondary amyloidosis; 12 of these 14 patients complained of heartburn. Abnormalities in the motility of the body of the esophagus were found in nine patients with primary amyloidosis and one with secondary amyloidosis. No abnormality of the upper esophageal sphincter was demonstrated in any of the 30 patients. Six of the nine patients with primary amyloidosis exhibiting the most marked esophageal motor dysfunction had striking evidence of peripheral and/or autonomic nervous system involvement. No consistent pattern of motility disorder was observed in either group. The manometric abnormalities observed are consistent with a random deposition of amyloid in the esophagus involving a myopathic and/or neuropathic component.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90874-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Later stages of amyloidosis may show low-amplitude contractions reflecting myopathic infiltration of smooth muscle.

    “Manometric studies suggest that early disease can manifest with motor incoordination consistent with neural involvement, whereas later stages may show low-amplitude contractions reflecting myopathic infiltration of smooth muscle (Battle et al., 1979; Camilleri et al., 1985; Rubinow et al., 1983).”
  • Manometric studies suggest that early amyloidosis can manifest with motor incoordination consistent with neural involvement.

    “Manometric studies suggest that early disease can manifest with motor incoordination consistent with neural involvement, whereas later stages may show low-amplitude contractions reflecting myopathic infiltration of smooth muscle (Battle et al., 1979; Camilleri et al., 1985; Rubinow et al., 1983).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubinow, A., Burakoff, R., Cohen, A. S., & Harris, L. D.
Corresponding author
Rubinow, Alan
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-12
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
951-956
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1522987328
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
esophageal motility, AL amyloidosis, AA amyloidosis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, heartburn, autonomic nervous system involvement, peripheral nerve involvement, esophageal manometry, amyloid deposition
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Amyloidosis, Esophagogastric Junction, Esophagus, Female, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Peristalsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review