Cited by 157Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

Circulating prolactin levels during the menstrual cycle: Episodic release and diurnal variation

Ehara, Y., Siler, T., Van den Berg, G., Sinha, Y.N., Yen, S.S.C.·1973·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90069-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serum PRL levels are significantly greater in females than in males when a large group of samples is examined, although with marked overlap.

    “Although a marked degree of overlap was found, serum PRL levels were significantly greater in females than in males when a large group of samples was examined (6).”
  • Before treatment, serum PRL levels in the hypogonadal subjects were comparable to values found in premenopausal women.

    “Before treatment, serum PRL levels in this group of hypogonadal subjects were comparable to the values found in premenopausal women (6).”
  • A quantitatively greater nocturnal episodic PRL release occurs during midcycle than during other phases of the menstrual cycle.

    “Moreover, a quantitatively greater nocturnal episodic PRL release has been seen during midcycle than during other phases of the cycle (6).”
  • Meaningful assessment of the physiologic and pharmacologic events of PRL release cannot be established unless frequent sampling at shorter intervals over a period of at least several hours is obtained.

    “In view of the recent demonstration of the episodic nature of PRL release (6, 10), meaningful assessment of the physiologic and pharmacologic events cannot be established unless frequent sampling at shorter intervals over a period of at least several hours is obtained.”
  • The detailed characterization of this assay in the authors' laboratory has been reported recently.

    “The detailed characterization of this assay in our laboratory has been reported recently (6).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 157

Authors
Ehara, Y., Siler, T., Van den Berg, G., Sinha, Y. N., & Yen, S. S. C.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1973-12
Volume
117
Issue
7
Pages
962-970
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1529873354
Cited by
157
References
25
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
prolactin, menstrual cycle, diurnal variation, circadian rhythm, luteinizing hormone surge, estrogen, ovulation, luteal phase, follicular phase, neuroendocrine regulation, ovarian function
MeSH terms
Adult, Amphetamine, Binding, Competitive, Circadian Rhythm, Estrogens, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Menstruation, Pregnancy, Progesterone, Prolactin, Radioimmunoassay, Sleep, Stimulation, Chemical, Time Factors, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review